CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success

Posted by Jeff Barlow
on 2000-11-20 18:56:01 UTC
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000 02:36:09 -0000, Wally wrote:

>
>The bottem line is there is no reason not to use a tantalum cap in a
>properly designed circuit.


I don't recall anyone saying there was. All I'm trying to say is that a
"properly designed circuit" for a foil electrolytic is not necessarily a
"properly designed circuit" for a tantalum. That is not a reason to
avoid tantalums, it just means be careful.

I think we've beat this to death, now.

Jeff

Discussion Thread

ballendo@y... 2000-11-20 17:48:45 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Mariss Freimanis 2000-11-20 18:12:18 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-20 18:16:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success Wally K 2000-11-20 18:21:22 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Wally K 2000-11-20 18:36:13 UTC Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-20 18:56:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jon Elson 2000-11-20 22:00:16 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: tantalum caps was emc success ballendo@y... 2000-11-20 22:21:27 UTC Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jon Elson 2000-11-21 21:46:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success Jeff Barlow 2000-11-22 08:02:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: tantalum caps was emc success