Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2000-11-25 00:27:57 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, ballendo@y... wrote:
between individuals...etc.) that conspiracy theories are used to
explain events, the actions and motivations of others, etc. - and
particularly events/actions that the people or organizations
concerned do not agree with. In reality, it is often far more
likely that the real reason (bad) things happen is incompetence, cock-
up, or simply accident. But conspiracies are MUCH more fun to
discuss...
Regards,
Tony
> <big snip>and the "cock-up theory" of why things happen.necessary
> >Tony
>
> This is a new one for me. Can you describe it. Off-list if
> or prudent.Simply that it is very common (in the press, on the media, in gossip
between individuals...etc.) that conspiracy theories are used to
explain events, the actions and motivations of others, etc. - and
particularly events/actions that the people or organizations
concerned do not agree with. In reality, it is often far more
likely that the real reason (bad) things happen is incompetence, cock-
up, or simply accident. But conspiracies are MUCH more fun to
discuss...
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-11-24 18:45:30 UTC
re: Standards debate (off topic)
Tony Jeffree
2000-11-25 00:27:57 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
ballendo@y...
2000-11-25 14:10:37 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Tony Jeffree
2000-11-25 15:04:24 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Jon Elson
2000-11-25 21:23:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Standards debate (off topic)