Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-11-25 14:10:37 UTC
Tony,
So its "conspiracy" vs. SNAFU, then :-)
Thank you.
Ballendo
So its "conspiracy" vs. SNAFU, then :-)
Thank you.
Ballendo
>Simply that it is very common (in the press, on the media, in gossip
>between individuals...etc.) that conspiracy theories are used to
>explain events, the actions and motivations of others, etc. - and
>particularly events/actions that the people or organizations
>concerned do not agree with. In reality, it is often far more
>likely that the real reason (bad) things happen is incompetence,
>cock-up, or simply accident. But conspiracies are MUCH more fun to
>discuss...
>Regards,Tony
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-11-24 18:45:30 UTC
re: Standards debate (off topic)
Tony Jeffree
2000-11-25 00:27:57 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
ballendo@y...
2000-11-25 14:10:37 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Tony Jeffree
2000-11-25 15:04:24 UTC
Re: Standards debate (off topic)
Jon Elson
2000-11-25 21:23:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Standards debate (off topic)