Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 920
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2000-11-27 19:07:27 UTC
Hey ART ART ART ART ART ART PHIL PHIL PHIL PHIL PHIL
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:03:44 -0500
From: "PhilC" <phil@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows Real-time
Art,
From: "Art Fenerty" <fenerty@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows Real-time
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Why don't you repost the same messages some more so that we can read them all 50 or 60 times, instead of just nesting your brief responses 5 or 6 responses deep?
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:03:44 -0500
From: "PhilC" <phil@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows Real-time
Art,
From: "Art Fenerty" <fenerty@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2000 9:54 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Windows Real-time
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 11/28/00 at 2:24 AM CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com wrote:
>This large message has been converted to an attachment.
> > > > > > > well as any dos version of stepping does.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Art
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@e...,an unmoderated list for the
> > > > > discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
Discussion Thread
Fred Smith
2000-11-27 19:07:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 920
phil@p...
2000-11-28 04:04:44 UTC
Re: Digest Number 920