Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx

Terry!

Don't do that, we want to hear your ideas/thoughts! QNX has come up
here at work as it's more "real-time" then DOS. Besides, it makes some
of us less obvious! ;>)

Alan KM6VV


"Terry L. Ridder" wrote:

>
> hello;
>
> i was thinking out load.
> considering the possibility.
> brainstorming.
>
> from now on i will keep my thoughts, brainstorming,
> ponder of possibilities to myself.
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, John Craddock wrote:
>
> john> Read the RTLinux archives.
> john> QNX doesn't come close to RTL or RTAI on latency
> john> specs and low latency is what you need for EMC
> john> especially for steppers. Why
> john> are you contemplating a port?
> john>

<snip>