RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx
Posted by
John Craddock
on 2000-11-28 16:34:31 UTC
Terry,
Didn't mean to offend maybe I was a bit abrupt. Sorry.
Regards
John
Didn't mean to offend maybe I was a bit abrupt. Sorry.
Regards
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry L. Ridder [mailto:terrylr@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 10:03 AM
> To: 'CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com'
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx
>
>
> hello;
>
> i was thinking out load.
> considering the possibility.
> brainstorming.
>
> from now on i will keep my thoughts, brainstorming,
> ponder of possibilities to myself.
>
>
> Welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@...,an unmoderated list
> for the discussion of shop built systems, for CAD, CAM, EDM, and DRO.
>
> Addresses:
> Post message: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@egroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@egroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://www.egroups.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> bill,
> List Manager
>
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-11-28 16:13:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-28 16:15:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx
John Craddock
2000-11-28 16:34:31 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx
Paul Devey
2000-11-29 08:17:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re[4]: qnx