Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2000-11-30 22:52:07 UTC
Smoke wrote:
meant 60 or 70 miles.
Next summer same thing on the Titan I sites around Larson AFB.
Dave
p.s sites were rather primitive when stuff was being installed. Real tough whe lightening take out the power and you are out in
one of the silos.
Later the generators were running and things got easier.
> I worked with Atlas F missiles..5 guys to a crew and PLENTY of room. 2Back in my student days I had a summer job doing x-ray on the PLS for the Atlas sites clustered around Spokane, WA. Clustered
meant 60 or 70 miles.
Next summer same thing on the Titan I sites around Larson AFB.
Dave
p.s sites were rather primitive when stuff was being installed. Real tough whe lightening take out the power and you are out in
one of the silos.
Later the generators were running and things got easier.
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-11-29 21:16:15 UTC
Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Smoke
2000-11-29 21:48:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Jon Elson
2000-11-30 21:40:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Jeff Barlow
2000-11-30 22:08:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Smoke
2000-11-30 22:33:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
dave engvall
2000-11-30 22:52:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-01 12:40:17 UTC
Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Smoke
2000-12-01 13:28:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-01 14:13:10 UTC
Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-01 14:23:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
Jon Elson
2000-12-01 23:24:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: missile guidance vs. CNC
ballendo@y...
2000-12-03 05:54:38 UTC
Re:Re: missile guidance vs. CNC