Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-12-07 16:00:47 UTC
Jeff Barlow wrote:
For the most part, it is fast enough that if you coordinated the message flow,
and only had the control PC and the motion box there, it probably would
work. Even still, there would be network management software that
would be sending out multicasts saying "I'm so-and-so, and I'm here!"
every second or so, and that would cause an occasional collision.
Jon
> >Ugh! Ethernet is specifically designed to almost NEVER be deterministic.
> Ethernet, anyone? Don't laugh, it works, it's fast, cheap, and not going
> away any time soon. Yeah, I know it has a few problems of it's own, but
> so do all the others.
For the most part, it is fast enough that if you coordinated the message flow,
and only had the control PC and the motion box there, it probably would
work. Even still, there would be network management software that
would be sending out multicasts saying "I'm so-and-so, and I'm here!"
every second or so, and that would cause an occasional collision.
Jon
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2000-12-06 22:56:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Greg Smith
2000-12-07 14:19:21 UTC
Re: Ports
Jon Elson
2000-12-07 16:00:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-07 16:33:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Wally K
2000-12-07 17:09:07 UTC
black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-07 17:25:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes
Wally K
2000-12-07 17:53:24 UTC
black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes