CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes

Posted by Jeff Barlow
on 2000-12-07 16:33:49 UTC
Jon,

Congratulations on being the first flaming arrow archer.

I've been designing PC interfaces for years and I'm not convinced any of
them are all that deterministic.

I am thinking in terms of only the control PC and the motion box on the
"network". Also there would be no real reason to run a full TCP/IP stack
on this so a lot of the other noise could go away.

Yes, this is a very half baked idea.

Jeff

On Thu, 07 Dec 2000 18:06:28 -0600, you wrote:

>
>
>Ugh! Ethernet is specifically designed to almost NEVER be deterministic.
>For the most part, it is fast enough that if you coordinated the message flow,
>and only had the control PC and the motion box there, it probably would
>work. Even still, there would be network management software that
>would be sending out multicasts saying "I'm so-and-so, and I'm here!"
>every second or so, and that would cause an occasional collision.
>
>Jon
>

Discussion Thread

dave engvall 2000-12-06 22:56:55 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes Greg Smith 2000-12-07 14:19:21 UTC Re: Ports Jon Elson 2000-12-07 16:00:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes Jeff Barlow 2000-12-07 16:33:49 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes Wally K 2000-12-07 17:09:07 UTC black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes Jeff Barlow 2000-12-07 17:25:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes Wally K 2000-12-07 17:53:24 UTC black box specs was Re: interpolation and algorithms of multiple axes