Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC, Dumb box and Software
Posted by
PhilC
on 2000-12-10 14:01:44 UTC
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Stevenson" <machines@...>
<snip>
> Taking [1] first. Why do we need windows? References keep being made to
> this but taking the fact that the PC will be a machine operating system
> taking in files it can use any base system. If we look at commercial
> machines they all have their own specialised system most are still DOS
> based and they work OK.The boot up time of DOS over windows is far greater
> and also it's stability.
> I personally can't see any reason for using windows - perhaps i'm missing
> something ?
<snip>
IMHO, being stuck developing software with DOS is very limiting. I want
something that will work with Win2k, myself.
Regards,
Phil
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2000-12-10 13:21:09 UTC
PC, Dumb box and Software
PhilC
2000-12-10 14:01:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC, Dumb box and Software
machines@n...
2000-12-10 15:55:40 UTC
Re: PC, Dumb box and Software
PhilC
2000-12-10 16:15:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC, Dumb box and Software
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 17:05:15 UTC
re: PC, Dumb box and Software
Jon Elson
2000-12-10 23:10:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC, Dumb box and Software
michael.hutton@k...
2000-12-27 13:02:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC, Dumb box and Software