CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

re:digitizers

on 2001-01-12 13:26:12 UTC
Elliot,

Interesting comments. Over constrained? Could be. Is that because the
cavities are conical? Better if they are countersinks with a tangential
contact?

In my mind, I can't see three angled grooves as having a finite "bottom"
I'd think the plane of the three balls could rock, and still stay in
contact?

Alan KM6VV

Elliot Burke wrote:
>
> If three balls in three conical cavities are used to located the sensor rod,
> things will be overconstrained. It is common in sensitive mechanical
> devices to use a kinematic mount for this sort of thing: three balls can be
> located with one in a cone, one in a groove, and one on a plane. Better is
> the three groove technique; the balls sit in three grooves which are angled
> to intersect each other towards the center of the triangle they describe.
> the groove is wide enough that the ball touches the walls tangentially.
> For sensitive systems carbide balls are used with sapphire plates, but that
> obviously won't work for a switch.
>
> I wonder what the hardest metalic conductive material is (that doesn't have
> problems with oxidation)?
>
> Elliot Burke

Discussion Thread

Elliot Burke 2001-01-12 10:27:50 UTC re:digitizers Alan Marconett KM6VV 2001-01-12 13:26:12 UTC re:digitizers ballendo@y... 2001-01-12 20:39:47 UTC re:digitizers Jon Elson 2001-01-12 23:17:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers Brian Pitt 2001-01-13 00:15:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers JanRwl@A... 2001-01-13 13:51:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers dave engvall 2001-01-13 16:04:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers Greg Nuspel 2001-01-13 17:11:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers