Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers
Posted by
dave engvall
on 2001-01-13 16:04:33 UTC
Jon Elson wrote:
otherwise:
MSC Chrome steel balls dia .250 $3.54/100
302 Stainless 9.46/100
316 SS 13.77/100
pg. 2695 2001 catalog
Dave
> ballendo@... wrote:I thought carbide ( as in tungsten carbide) was conductive. That should be hard enough and available. Tho MSC doesn't list them.
>
> > Elliot wrote:
> > >I wonder what the hardest metalic conductive material is (that
> > >doesn't have problems with oxidation)?
> >
> > Elliot,
> >
> > Just guessing, Platinum? Indium?
>
> Hard Chrome is pretty good. 316 stainless is quite good.
> Pure Tungsten is quite hard, as well.
>
> I don't want to know what 3 1/4" Platinum balls would cost!
>
> Jon
otherwise:
MSC Chrome steel balls dia .250 $3.54/100
302 Stainless 9.46/100
316 SS 13.77/100
pg. 2695 2001 catalog
Dave
Discussion Thread
Elliot Burke
2001-01-12 10:27:50 UTC
re:digitizers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-01-12 13:26:12 UTC
re:digitizers
ballendo@y...
2001-01-12 20:39:47 UTC
re:digitizers
Jon Elson
2001-01-12 23:17:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers
Brian Pitt
2001-01-13 00:15:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers
JanRwl@A...
2001-01-13 13:51:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers
dave engvall
2001-01-13 16:04:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers
Greg Nuspel
2001-01-13 17:11:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:digitizers