Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:re:AMP connectors
Posted by
Dick Ganderton
on 2001-01-19 06:05:22 UTC
Much better, I wish everyone would do it!
Now, does anyone knowm how to get rid of all that junk that e-groups put in
the header? It takes up all of the standard size Eudora message window,
making it impossible to do a quick scan of the message to see whether it's
worth reading. I have tried clicking on the Blah biot - it makes it even
worse!!
snip
Now, does anyone knowm how to get rid of all that junk that e-groups put in
the header? It takes up all of the standard size Eudora message window,
making it impossible to do a quick scan of the message to see whether it's
worth reading. I have tried clicking on the Blah biot - it makes it even
worse!!
snip
>snip
>P.S. I've gone back to my old style reply technique, where the
>message being replied TO, comes AFTER the reply... This should make
>it easier for someone who knows the topic to save time reading posts.
>Whaddya think?
>
>>Well, you did say something similar. It appears youi weren't
>>talking about forging tho'. I just mentioned forging 'cause it's
Discussion Thread
Graham Hollis
2001-01-17 13:20:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] AMP connectors
John D. Guenther
2001-01-17 14:27:44 UTC
Re: AMP connectors
Tim Goldstein
2001-01-17 18:11:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] AMP connectors
Smoke
2001-01-17 20:57:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] AMP connectors
ballendo@y...
2001-01-18 03:38:29 UTC
re: re: AMP connectors
ballendo@y...
2001-01-18 06:05:35 UTC
re:re:AMP connectors
Smoke
2001-01-18 10:58:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:AMP connectors
ballendo@y...
2001-01-18 20:49:00 UTC
Re: re:re:AMP connectors
Dick Ganderton
2001-01-19 06:05:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: re:re:AMP connectors