CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC

Posted by ballendo@y...
on 2001-01-31 03:28:39 UTC
Jon,

I know that theoretically lookahead (which is recursive) could be infinite. I thought EMC limited it to around 150 blocks?

10-15 seconds is a small time price to pay for the ability to "back up" in the program? (by running forward)

Ballendo


>>This was really what I had in mind when I said that perhaps the >>machine could back up a bit and 'take a run at the work' after a >>pause. I hadn't really appreciated the extent of the look-ahead but, >>now looking back over earlier posts it seems it can be quite a way >>so perhaps the idea isn't feasible. Is the look-ahead a defined >>quantity like so many lines

>No, the lookahead is infinite, and can extend to the end of the >program, if necessary. In some complex surface contour work, it can >actually extend over thousands or even tens of thousands of blocks of >code.

>It can take 10 - 15 seconds for a 100 MHz Pentium to run through all >the moves in some of my engraving programs, which are the biggest >I've run so far.
> Jon

Discussion Thread

Jon Elson 2001-01-25 22:27:45 UTC Re: suggested improvement for EMC Ray 2001-01-26 18:35:29 UTC Re: suggested improvement for EMC Ian Wright 2001-01-27 02:51:26 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: suggested improvement for EMC Brian Pitt 2001-01-27 04:27:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: suggested improvement for EMC Jon Elson 2001-01-27 12:39:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: suggested improvement for EMC Jon Elson 2001-01-27 13:04:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: suggested improvement for EMC ballendo@y... 2001-01-29 13:39:23 UTC re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC Jon Elson 2001-01-29 16:30:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC ballendo@y... 2001-01-29 20:38:35 UTC RE:re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC Ian Wright 2001-01-30 01:46:10 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC Jon Elson 2001-01-30 22:12:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC ballendo@y... 2001-01-31 03:28:39 UTC re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC Ray 2001-02-04 16:22:46 UTC Re: re:Re: suggested improvement for EMC