RE: Joystick and EMC.
Posted by
Paul.Corner
on 1999-09-06 16:12:50 UTC
On Sat, 04 Sep 1999, you wrote:
it.
The joystick could be set to given feed rate, it also had a small button in the
end of the stick to over-ride the set feed rate- useful for rapid traverses.
Yes the joystick could be dangerous, but so can an incorrectly programed G code.
My choice would be a joystick and a handwheel, both with programable feed
rates/resolutions. Just a thought - a feed back loop so the handwheel feels
like it is connected to the feed screw !
Regards, Paul.
> From: "Tim Goldstein" <timg@...>I've used a machine fitted with an electronic handwheel and a joystick next to
>
> I would add my vote to say encoder feedback would be a far more useful
> feature than a joystick. I think that developing a manual pendent would
> provide far more utility than a joystick and it does not require any
> additional hardware in the computer or changes to the software.
>
it.
The joystick could be set to given feed rate, it also had a small button in the
end of the stick to over-ride the set feed rate- useful for rapid traverses.
Yes the joystick could be dangerous, but so can an incorrectly programed G code.
My choice would be a joystick and a handwheel, both with programable feed
rates/resolutions. Just a thought - a feed back loop so the handwheel feels
like it is connected to the feed screw !
Regards, Paul.
Discussion Thread
Dan Mauch
1999-09-03 09:27:15 UTC
Re: Joystick and EMC.
Dan Falck
1999-09-03 19:59:07 UTC
Re: Joystick and EMC.
Tim Goldstein
1999-09-03 21:06:46 UTC
RE: Joystick and EMC.
Jon Elson
1999-09-03 23:18:09 UTC
Re: Joystick and EMC.
Paul.Corner
1999-09-06 16:12:50 UTC
RE: Joystick and EMC.