Re: standar for movements?
Posted by
machines@n...
on 2001-06-17 14:20:57 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Fitch R. Williams <frwillia@p...> wrote:
If you take table movement relative to the earth, taking the
curvature that's got to be massive I and J figures for the arc ??
Sorry just couldn't resist.
John Stevenson.
> I think in terms like cutter moving to +x, cutter moving to -y, etc.+X
> It just so happens, the table is moving the opposite direction. A
> cutter movement relative to the table is caused by a -X tablemovement
> relative to the earth.Fitch
>
If you take table movement relative to the earth, taking the
curvature that's got to be massive I and J figures for the arc ??
Sorry just couldn't resist.
John Stevenson.
Discussion Thread
afogassa@y...
2001-06-17 13:27:44 UTC
standar for movements?
Fitch R. Williams
2001-06-17 13:39:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] standar for movements?
machines@n...
2001-06-17 14:20:57 UTC
Re: standar for movements?
jvicars@c...
2001-06-17 15:38:32 UTC
Re: standar for movements?
Jon Elson
2001-06-17 21:58:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] standar for movements?
ballendo@y...
2001-06-18 20:09:44 UTC
Re: standard for movements?