Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Posted by
cadcamcenter@y...
on 2001-08-02 00:52:36 UTC
> cadcamcenter@y... wrote:very good choice. It will be totally unacceptable for software-
> > I will be taking possession of a 486 and wondering if it may be
> > suitable for installing EMC. Or is installing both EMC and CNCPro
> > asking too much?
> Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> section is different. A 486 can be made to work, but it is not a
generated step pulses. It seems a 266 MHz pentium is the absolute
minimum there.
Thanks Jon. Just for the experience, I think I'll try to load Paul's
BDI on the 486 and see what happens. But I'll probably use the 486
exclusively for DOS based software after that.
The 486 already has Win95 loaded. Sorry. Hadn't been following the
discussions about EMC and BDI too closely, but do I need to unload
Win95 first?
Thanks again.
Peter
Discussion Thread
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-01 20:58:03 UTC
486 & EMC or CNCPro
Jon Elson
2001-08-01 21:39:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 486 & EMC or CNCPro
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-02 00:52:36 UTC
Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Jon Elson
2001-08-02 09:48:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-02 11:14:21 UTC
Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Paul
2001-08-02 11:33:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-02 11:57:13 UTC
Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Stephen Goldsmith
2001-08-02 14:20:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Paul
2001-08-02 16:20:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Jon Elson
2001-08-02 22:29:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-03 00:34:15 UTC
Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-03 11:27:06 UTC
Re: 486 & EMC or CNCPro