Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
Posted by
Larry Edington
on 2001-08-18 21:03:29 UTC
Sure, just don't use the L298. Put some Mosfet drivers
on the L298 and use your favorite N type Mosfet in
an H bridge. Or create a negative power supply and
use a P type for the upper part of the bridge and an N type Mosfet
for the lower part of the bridge which will eliminate
the need for the Mosfet driver. You'll just use a transistor
or optoisolator to turn the Mosfet gates on via the L297.
I just built some 10 amp drivers using an L297 and IRF540
Mosfets using IR2103 drivers. Next rev gets a 16F628 PIC
microcontroller instead of the L297.
later,
Larry E.
on the L298 and use your favorite N type Mosfet in
an H bridge. Or create a negative power supply and
use a P type for the upper part of the bridge and an N type Mosfet
for the lower part of the bridge which will eliminate
the need for the Mosfet driver. You'll just use a transistor
or optoisolator to turn the Mosfet gates on via the L297.
I just built some 10 amp drivers using an L297 and IRF540
Mosfets using IR2103 drivers. Next rev gets a 16F628 PIC
microcontroller instead of the L297.
later,
Larry E.
----- Original Message -----
From: "David E. Queen" <daque@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 10:28 PM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
> Is there a easy way to get more current using a L297/L298 chipset? I need
> about 5 amps for the free 200 oz/inch steppers I found.
>
> No need for me to invent something if its been done before.
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Discussion Thread
David E. Queen
2001-08-18 20:29:37 UTC
Current and the L298
Larry Edington
2001-08-18 21:03:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 00:45:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
daque@s...
2001-08-19 09:41:16 UTC
Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 10:00:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Ross Overstreet
2001-08-19 11:19:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Tim Goldstein
2001-08-19 11:44:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 11:57:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 12:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Ian Wright
2001-08-19 15:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 15:59:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Tony Jeffree
2001-08-20 00:32:31 UTC
Re: Current and the L298
Dan Mauch
2001-08-20 06:54:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540