Re: Current and the L298
Posted by
Tony Jeffree
on 2001-08-20 00:32:31 UTC
At 05:36 19/08/2001 +0000, you wrote:
298 to drive one motor coil, so you need 2 298's per motor. However, it
gives you less than twice the current - about 3 amps if I remember
rightly. The SGS Thompson data sheets detail how this is done - try:
http://us.st.com/stonline/bin/pnsearch.exe
Regards,
Tony
>Is there a easy way to get more current using a L297/L298 chipset? I needIt is possible to get more current - effectively, you use both halves of a
>about 5 amps for the free 200 oz/inch steppers I found.
298 to drive one motor coil, so you need 2 298's per motor. However, it
gives you less than twice the current - about 3 amps if I remember
rightly. The SGS Thompson data sheets detail how this is done - try:
http://us.st.com/stonline/bin/pnsearch.exe
Regards,
Tony
Discussion Thread
David E. Queen
2001-08-18 20:29:37 UTC
Current and the L298
Larry Edington
2001-08-18 21:03:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 00:45:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Current and the L298
daque@s...
2001-08-19 09:41:16 UTC
Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 10:00:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Ross Overstreet
2001-08-19 11:19:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Tim Goldstein
2001-08-19 11:44:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 11:57:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 12:08:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Ian Wright
2001-08-19 15:14:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Larry Edington
2001-08-19 15:59:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540
Tony Jeffree
2001-08-20 00:32:31 UTC
Re: Current and the L298
Dan Mauch
2001-08-20 06:54:08 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Current and the L298 & IRF530/IRF540