Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-09-11 21:10:42 UTC
Drew Rogge wrote:
then i think the calculation would be pretty accurate. When plowing
the bottom of a slot, I suspect the force may be much higher. My experience
with manual machining tells me it is a lot higher.
Jon
> Jon Elson wrote:Yes, that is the first part. If an end mill is used to take a very thin side cut,
> > But, we're really going around in circles, here. Let's start from the
> > beginning. You want to use 1/2 Hp with up to 1/2" end mills, at what
> > RPM? In aluminum, 600 SFPM is recommended, so that comes out to about
> > 4300 RPM. A dirty worst case cutting force calculation would show that
> > the torque to turn the tool was .5 Hp x 550 Ft-Lb/Sec = 275 ft-Lb/sec
> > A 1/2" end mill has a circumference of .5 X Pi = 1.571" or .131 Ft, and
> > is turning 4300 times a minute, or 71.7 times a second. So, the peripheral
> > velocity is 71.7 x .131 = 9.388 Ft/Sec. To get equivalent torque under these
> > circumstances, (275 Ft-Lb/Sec) / (9.388 Ft/Sec) = 29.3 Lbs.
>
> Jon,
>
> Sorry for being so dense but this is all new to me. Is the part
> of your mail I've referenced above the "worst case cutting force
> calculation" you mentioned?
then i think the calculation would be pretty accurate. When plowing
the bottom of a slot, I suspect the force may be much higher. My experience
with manual machining tells me it is a lot higher.
> Also did you base the initial .5 Hp requirement on my calculation ofYes, essentially.
> removing 1.5 cu. in. of al. per minute?
>Ah, yes. I know I'd gone through this, but didn't remember where it was.
> I also wanted to mention that I found a page on your web site that
> also helps to explain some of this. The URL is:
>
> http://206.19.206.56/motor.htm
Jon
Discussion Thread
Drew Rogge
2001-09-10 19:29:44 UTC
More on servo motor selection
drew@p...
2001-09-10 19:35:25 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
ym_wong@p...
2001-09-10 20:07:22 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
mariss92705@y...
2001-09-10 20:26:11 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
ym_wong@p...
2001-09-10 20:27:06 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
Weyland
2001-09-10 21:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
ym_wong@p...
2001-09-10 21:37:01 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
Jon Elson
2001-09-10 22:43:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
Jon Elson
2001-09-10 22:46:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
Drew Rogge
2001-09-11 09:06:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
Drew Rogge
2001-09-11 09:09:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
Drew Rogge
2001-09-11 09:15:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
Peter Seddon
2001-09-11 10:08:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 11:12:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
Drew Rogge
2001-09-11 12:30:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
Peter Seddon
2001-09-11 13:03:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 13:54:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: More on servo motor selection
info.host@b...
2001-09-11 14:46:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
Drew Rogge
2001-09-11 15:18:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
shymu@b...
2001-09-11 15:27:21 UTC
Re: More on servo motor selection
Jon Elson
2001-09-11 21:10:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
Peter Seddon
2001-09-12 03:29:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] More on servo motor selection
currinh@O...
2001-09-13 20:17:41 UTC
Flexible Tracks
Sven Peter
2001-09-14 07:40:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Tracks
Jon Elson
2001-09-14 11:54:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Tracks
Sven Peter
2001-09-14 15:19:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flexible Tracks