Re: Dome question
Posted by
yethdear0
on 2001-12-07 12:14:09 UTC
I too use Mastercam and Surfcam. Its a matter of what kind of time do
I have? What kind of polishing does tooling want to do on this
surface? and How big of a program am I going to have.
On complicated models with multiple surfaces (100+), if I chose to
perform a standard cusp height, then it would either take forever for
the computer to generate the toopaths, or it would kill my computer.
So I opt for a standard step down. Most of the time I step down
only .001 other times I go to .0001
Other times, I know that a mold is going straight to the injection
machine, so then I have a surface finish issue. I'll program multiple
toolpaths in different directions and using different methods cutting
over the same surface in order to produce the best finish I can. the
machine times are 12+ hours but the tooling guys load it up at 5pm
and let it run through the night.
It all falls in that catagory of "More than one way to skin a cat"
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@r...>
wrote:
I have? What kind of polishing does tooling want to do on this
surface? and How big of a program am I going to have.
On complicated models with multiple surfaces (100+), if I chose to
perform a standard cusp height, then it would either take forever for
the computer to generate the toopaths, or it would kill my computer.
So I opt for a standard step down. Most of the time I step down
only .001 other times I go to .0001
Other times, I know that a mold is going straight to the injection
machine, so then I have a surface finish issue. I'll program multiple
toolpaths in different directions and using different methods cutting
over the same surface in order to produce the best finish I can. the
machine times are 12+ hours but the tooling guys load it up at 5pm
and let it run through the night.
It all falls in that catagory of "More than one way to skin a cat"
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Randy Gordon-Gilmore <zephyrus@r...>
wrote:
> At 07:12 PM 12/7/2001 -0000, yethdear0 wrote:your
>
> >First- The program is a test program to be used to determine if
> >machine control would interpret full 3 axis motion.machine that"
>
> OK. I was just wondering more from a "if I really needed to
> standpoint.programed
>
> >a radial cut. As you get farther out on the edge of the dome, the
> >cusp hight increases again. To prevent this, I would have
>asked. I
> Yes, that "pie-wedge" aspect of the radial machining is why I
> thought that in, say, Mastercam (which is what our shop at workuses) you
> can specify a maximum scallop height instead of a constant stepover/down.
> As shallow as the dome is, I would think that stepping in radiallyby an
> increment and then doing a circle at whatever necessary depth wouldmake a
> lot less machining passes, and minimum scallops.simulated
>
> I have done a lot of "manual CNC" profile machining (like a
> extrusion), where I drew the cross-section of the shape and then aparallel
> contour at .0005 outside it, then drew tangent circles representingthe
> ballnose that are tangent to the profile and cross each other atthe outer
> limit contour. Picked up on the centerpoints of the circles andused them
> as the Y and Z coordinates. I was always surprised how few passesit took
> when they were "intelligently" selected rather than "step down Zamount and
> see how far over you need to move)..._________________
>
> Best regards,
>
> Randy
>
> Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________
> ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == == === == =|
> Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o-----------o==o-'
> zephyrus@r... http://www.rickadee.net/~zephyrus
Discussion Thread
Ray
2001-12-07 06:56:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 1837
yethdear0
2001-12-07 07:06:22 UTC
Re: Digest Number 1837
M Doogan
2001-12-07 07:42:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 1837
yethdear0
2001-12-07 10:46:27 UTC
Re: Digest Number 1837
yethdear0
2001-12-07 10:50:54 UTC
Re: Digest Number 1837
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-12-07 10:55:38 UTC
Dome question
yethdear0
2001-12-07 11:12:20 UTC
Re: Dome question
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-12-07 11:48:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Dome question
yethdear0
2001-12-07 12:14:09 UTC
Re: Dome question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-12-07 15:02:31 UTC
Re: Digest Number 1837
yethdear0
2001-12-07 16:07:46 UTC
Re: Digest Number 1837
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2001-12-09 10:31:58 UTC
Re: Dome question