Re: emc with camtronics just too strange
Posted by
bgroover1
on 2001-12-13 06:10:48 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
moves when that is compounded over inches it will make the whole
setup useless. Radius cutting in metal will require many slow, small,
hard(mechanical resistance wise) moves. Thats just what I am having
a problem with slow, small moves. I don't expect to keep that kind
of accuracy over any real distance but just about any machine tool
should be able to keep it over a straight line for a short distance
after the gear train is preloaded for backlash/slop etc.
Thanks for the deadzone suggestion. See my other post. Freqmod
seems to have helped my problem. I am going to try more computer.
thanks again,
ben
> Why are you so concerned with .001" steps? Can your machine reallyThe problem is that if I have a random error of +/- .003 on small
> hold such fine accuracy?
>
moves when that is compounded over inches it will make the whole
setup useless. Radius cutting in metal will require many slow, small,
hard(mechanical resistance wise) moves. Thats just what I am having
a problem with slow, small moves. I don't expect to keep that kind
of accuracy over any real distance but just about any machine tool
should be able to keep it over a straight line for a short distance
after the gear train is preloaded for backlash/slop etc.
Thanks for the deadzone suggestion. See my other post. Freqmod
seems to have helped my problem. I am going to try more computer.
thanks again,
ben
Discussion Thread
bgroover1
2001-12-12 04:52:45 UTC
emc with camtronics just too strange
Jon Elson
2001-12-12 10:28:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc with camtronics just too strange
bgroover1
2001-12-13 06:10:48 UTC
Re: emc with camtronics just too strange
ccs@m...
2001-12-13 06:43:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc with camtronics just too strange
Jon Elson
2001-12-13 10:44:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc with camtronics just too strange