Re: Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-10-31 21:41:37 UTC
bfp@... wrote:
Also, it burns away very quickly at soldering iron temperature. I've never
found it to be usable at all. Also, the electroless tin is as likely to deposit
on the fiberglass as on the conductive ink. It has some sort of reaction on
copper, but won't deposit on a lot of other surfaces.
Jon
> I wonder if you could draw the traces onto a non-conductive surface with oneThis won't work very well. The electroless tin is very 'fuzzy', ie. low density.
> of those conductive ink pens,then use an elecroless tin dip plating solution
> to build them up to a good thickness? Has anyone tried this?
Also, it burns away very quickly at soldering iron temperature. I've never
found it to be usable at all. Also, the electroless tin is as likely to deposit
on the fiberglass as on the conductive ink. It has some sort of reaction on
copper, but won't deposit on a lot of other surfaces.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Paul Devey
1999-10-26 20:15:07 UTC
Hobbiests Strike Again
Paul Devey
1999-10-26 20:16:25 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Darrell Gehlsen
1999-10-26 20:13:21 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Matt Shaver
1999-10-26 21:27:30 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
WAnliker@x...
1999-10-26 21:37:07 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Paul Devey
1999-10-27 09:01:15 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Dan Mauch
1999-10-28 05:57:48 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
hansw
1999-10-28 06:17:41 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
bfp@x...
1999-10-31 01:02:32 UTC
Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Dan Mauch
1999-10-31 08:05:50 UTC
Re: Re: Hobbiests Strike Again
Jon Elson
1999-10-31 21:41:37 UTC
Re: Re: Hobbiests Strike Again