Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mill retro-fit info available...
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-01-07 22:55:47 UTC
Matt Shaver wrote:
silicon carbide to hold that sort of accuracy. If I got 500 IPM on my
Bridgeport, it would tip over! Just because the encoders are within
that tolerance doesn't mean the cutting tool is within that tolerance
on the workpiece.
Jon
> scottleatham wrote:20 u In at 500 IPM, huh! The machine must be made out of filigreed
>
> > Galil: I'd like to talk with people that use Galil controllers! I
> > like the card a lot, I'm getting incredible speed and accuracy on my
> > machine, close to 2/100,000ths of an inch at about 500 ipm!
>
> This is very impressive! How did you measure it?
>
silicon carbide to hold that sort of accuracy. If I got 500 IPM on my
Bridgeport, it would tip over! Just because the encoders are within
that tolerance doesn't mean the cutting tool is within that tolerance
on the workpiece.
Jon
Discussion Thread
scottleatham
2002-01-07 18:22:52 UTC
Mill retro-fit info available...
Matt Shaver
2002-01-07 21:59:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mill retro-fit info available...
Jon Elson
2002-01-07 22:55:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Mill retro-fit info available...
scottleatham
2002-01-08 12:01:05 UTC
Re: Mill retro-fit info available...
scottleatham
2002-01-08 12:13:34 UTC
Re: Mill retro-fit info available...
Jon Elson
2002-01-08 22:29:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Mill retro-fit info available...
ballendo
2002-01-09 09:03:10 UTC
Ball-bar Re: Mill retro-fit info available...
Jon Elson
2002-01-09 23:27:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ball-bar Re: Mill retro-fit info available...
Hugh Currin
2002-01-10 08:59:49 UTC
Re: Ball-bar
Jon Elson
2002-01-10 10:43:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Ball-bar
Wayne Weedon
2002-01-10 10:57:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ball-bar Re: Mill retro-fit info available...