Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Posted by
Russell Shaw
on 2002-01-17 04:26:43 UTC
It makes one wonder about the 'elasticity' of the machine
when doing small steps. I suppose if the cutter is going
fast, there shouldn't be much force. I'm aiming for a
work area of 2.4m x 1.2m. I'll use DC servos and chain
drive. I haven't seen very long lead screws.
How cheap can you get 1000 pulses/rev encoders (or 250 pulse
encoders if you can count edges)?
ballendo wrote:
when doing small steps. I suppose if the cutter is going
fast, there shouldn't be much force. I'm aiming for a
work area of 2.4m x 1.2m. I'll use DC servos and chain
drive. I haven't seen very long lead screws.
How cheap can you get 1000 pulses/rev encoders (or 250 pulse
encoders if you can count edges)?
ballendo wrote:
>
> Russell,
>
> There are a lot of machines out there based on 5TPI (.200"lead)
> screws. When driven by a "typical" 1.8° stepper, which has either 200
> (fullstep) or 400(halfstep) SPR(Steps Per Revolution), you get a
> SYSTEM resolution of .001 or .0005 inches/step.
>
> Another factor is that you generally want a resolution at least
> double your intended accuracy; so for a machine designed to make
> parts of .001 tolerance, the scales of .0005 are a minimum.
>
> Now to your router: There are many commercial (and expensive) routers
> which have only 500 SPI (Steps Per Inch). This is often a trade-off
> to get the higher top speed this type of machine needs. Modern
> technology is making some of these trade-offs less demanding than
> they used to be, due to things like fast block times and pulse trains
> from the controllers, affordable microstepping drives, and more
> powerful magnets, which translate into more compact and electrically
> efficient motors...
>
> Beware of "empty" resolution. This is where your machine makes
> several steps without moving. Also beware of equating resolution with
> accuracy; they are NOT the same thing!
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ballendo
Discussion Thread
studleylee
2002-01-16 11:12:40 UTC
DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Dan Mauch
2002-01-16 11:36:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Russell Shaw
2002-01-16 16:04:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
studleylee
2002-01-16 16:18:22 UTC
Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Russell Shaw
2002-01-16 16:25:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-16 16:33:25 UTC
Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Russell Shaw
2002-01-16 16:42:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
ballendo
2002-01-17 03:19:49 UTC
Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Russell Shaw
2002-01-17 04:26:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Doug Fortune
2002-01-17 16:33:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Doug Fortune
2002-01-17 16:41:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Russell Shaw
2002-01-17 16:52:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
Jon Elson
2002-01-17 22:15:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4
nf1z
2002-01-18 13:01:01 UTC
Re: DRO: USDigital new resolutions 250cpi x 4