Re: serial/USB was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2002-01-24 10:40:27 UTC
Hi Ian, list,
Rutex HAS a defined serial design, and published spec's on it's
protocol. I've said before:
http://rutex.com/
I have one, and will be implementing it for my tests. DeskNC for Windoz
would be another candidate. Mariss' is coming along too!
OK, who's going to start a USB project? (someone probably has, they're
just not talking about 'em).
Alan KM6VV
Ian Wright wrote:
Rutex HAS a defined serial design, and published spec's on it's
protocol. I've said before:
http://rutex.com/
I have one, and will be implementing it for my tests. DeskNC for Windoz
would be another candidate. Mariss' is coming along too!
OK, who's going to start a USB project? (someone probably has, they're
just not talking about 'em).
Alan KM6VV
Ian Wright wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mr. sausage" <sirsausage@...>
> >
> > Although I'm completly new to PC based CNC, I am amazed this day and age
> > people use a PC parallel port and software timing to control either
> steppers
> > (or what I call a 'stepper emulator' Geckos). I bought the deskwinnc card
> > because it is a serial controlled device and, although I haven't even
> > assembled my system yet, I'm hoping it will relieve me of this huge
> concern
> > of PC Operating System.
> >
> > How would *you* most like to control your CNC device from your PC?
>
> My only thought on this is that, by going to serial control, you are pretty
> much tying yourself to one manufacturer. The serial interfaces which I have
> seen available so far all seem to use some kind of dedicated system which
> links them with a particular CAM program or machine and so lack flexibility.
> >From the hobbiests point of view, use of the parallel port and steppers
> allows a wide range of options and the opportunity to use easily salvaged
> motors and home-made drivers etc.
> If someone were to publish on the internet a freely available design for a
> serial interface which could be made at home, together with any necessary
> PIC code etc. - and which gave the option of selecting communications
> protocol, altering pinouts to suit various machines etc., then I think many
> more people would go the serial/USB route.
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian W. Wright
> Sheffield UK
> www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-24 10:40:27 UTC
Re: serial/USB was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Terry L. Ridder
2002-01-24 10:54:41 UTC
Re: serial/USB
CL
2002-01-24 12:20:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: serial/USB was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-01-24 21:56:32 UTC
Re: serial/USB was Re: Whither goest DOS?
Engine Tech
2002-01-24 23:27:23 UTC
EDM Question
ballendo
2002-01-25 06:44:54 UTC
firewire and 3d cad was serial/USB
Jon Elson
2002-01-25 10:09:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM Question
buchpa
2002-01-27 08:40:41 UTC
Re: EDM Question
Babar
2002-01-29 23:17:50 UTC
"Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
Engine Tech
2002-01-30 07:17:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
stirlinguy
2002-01-30 07:32:51 UTC
Re: "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
Engine Tech
2002-01-30 08:02:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
arcstarter
2002-01-30 09:56:24 UTC
Re: "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
wbhinkle@a...
2002-01-30 12:04:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois
Spehro Pefhany
2002-01-30 12:44:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] "Build an EDM", by Robert Langlois