Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Posted by
Marcus & Eva
on 2002-02-01 19:07:55 UTC
Hi Chris:
That's what I had in mind too.
Thanks for the input!
Cheers
Marcus
That's what I had in mind too.
Thanks for the input!
Cheers
Marcus
----- Original Message -----
From: <ccs@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
> Microsteps are great for smoothing out motion, but should not be
> counted on to have even distribution. So if you really had only a few
> steps over a long distance, you probably would see some waviness.
> It's probably better to use a timing belt reduction to make the real
> step size small, or best of all to use a servo system with a fine
> encoder resolution - which will be more even and lets you put the
> encoder on the screw, eliminating any inconsistency in the reduction
> drive.
>
> Chris Stratton
Discussion Thread
Carlos Guillermo
2002-01-28 17:08:16 UTC
Lathe CNC retrofit
IMService
2002-01-29 07:27:18 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Smoke
2002-01-29 07:53:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
ballendo
2002-01-30 01:35:55 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-30 08:32:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
ballendo
2002-01-30 08:50:43 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-30 16:13:07 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-30 21:03:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Marcus & Eva
2002-01-30 21:34:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-31 00:59:04 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
ballendo
2002-02-01 08:21:22 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
ccs@m...
2002-02-01 08:52:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Marcus & Eva
2002-02-01 18:51:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
Marcus & Eva
2002-02-01 19:07:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Lathe CNC retrofit
ballendo
2002-02-01 19:24:46 UTC
Re: Lathe CNC retrofit