Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC Lineage
Posted by
Brian Pitt
on 2002-03-12 19:42:57 UTC
its realy just one lineage
the EMC tarballs are numbered by packaging date
1.1-17 was 2001-Jan-17 and 2.1.16 is this years release
most people just use CVS to download the current source tree
or use the prepackaged versions
Brian
the EMC tarballs are numbered by packaging date
1.1-17 was 2001-Jan-17 and 2.1.16 is this years release
most people just use CVS to download the current source tree
or use the prepackaged versions
Brian
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 06:07, you wrote:
> I want to have a look at Linux and EMC for CNC
>
> Because I want to try this on an old IBM Thinkpad 760ED I am going to
> install Red Hat 7.2 and add the Real time kernel. I see there are are
> two lineages of EMC 2.1.16 and 1.1-17.
>
> I am confused by the fact that the Aug 2000 states 2_2_14 which one
> would have thought was post 2.1.16.
>
> From the fact that things flip flop from 2.x.x release to 1.x.x I
> assume this is the normal Linux thing of one experimental code base
> and one more solid code base that work alternates between them. My
> question is which is the best code base to go for 2.x.x. or a 1.x.x .
> Same question goes for RTL
Discussion Thread
keithsloanuk
2002-03-12 13:59:44 UTC
EMC Lineage
Paul
2002-03-12 14:45:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC Lineage
Brian Pitt
2002-03-12 19:42:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC Lineage
Jon Elson
2002-03-12 22:55:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC Lineage