Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-03-21 22:39:27 UTC
mariss92705 wrote:
deceleration. In other words, when a motor is accelerating a load,
the current and voltage relationship is much like a resistor. When
decelerating a load, the current flow is the other way, and the motor
has the characteristic of a NEGATIVE resistor, ie. a power source.
If the deceleration is severe, then the armature resistance may indeed
absorb all energy, and the circuit looks resistive again, but for larger
motors with heavy loads being gradually decelerated, this is not
usually true. I will make some measurements on my system to
prove this over the weekend.
transmission, unless you burn the clutch severely, the engine will be
spinning backwards, and acting as a weak brake, but producing no
power. If you could do this with an automatic, it would burn a great deal
of power in the torque converter. The torque converter or clutch would
be forced to burn ALL the energy of the moving car, plus the energy
applied by the engine at RPM x torque.
but in general it doesn't care much, either. Shortly before speed drops
to zero, the voltage across the armature terminals will pass through
zero, and the motor will change from negative resistance to positive.
The armature resistance causes this to happen just before the armature
actually reverses direction.
Jon
> Les, Jon,There is a big difference. Energy flows the other way during
>
> I don't mean to belabor the point but once I have my teeth into
> something I have to take to its conclusion. That means I have to make
> sure I understand the underlying principle or have others show me
> where I am mistaken.
>
> I am making two assumptions:
>
> (1) "Energy return" during deceleration is not a given.
> (2) There is no difference between acceleration and deceleration.
deceleration. In other words, when a motor is accelerating a load,
the current and voltage relationship is much like a resistor. When
decelerating a load, the current flow is the other way, and the motor
has the characteristic of a NEGATIVE resistor, ie. a power source.
If the deceleration is severe, then the armature resistance may indeed
absorb all energy, and the circuit looks resistive again, but for larger
motors with heavy loads being gradually decelerated, this is not
usually true. I will make some measurements on my system to
prove this over the weekend.
>Most transmissions will NOT let you do this! certainly, with a manual
> Both points are tied together in this thought experiment:
>
> Say you are in a car that is rolling backwards at 20 MPH and the
> transmission is in "drive". You apply torque (press the gas) to the
> drive wheels at a constant rate. The car decelerates, stops, then
> accelerates until you are going 20 MPH in the forward direction. Oh
> yeah, and your eyes are closed as well (don't try this at home folks,
> this is a trained professional driver).
>
> The questions are:
>
> (1) If "energy return" is a given, why are you pressing the gas pedal
> during deceleration?
transmission, unless you burn the clutch severely, the engine will be
spinning backwards, and acting as a weak brake, but producing no
power. If you could do this with an automatic, it would burn a great deal
of power in the torque converter. The torque converter or clutch would
be forced to burn ALL the energy of the moving car, plus the energy
applied by the engine at RPM x torque.
>In the car, it is hard - without instruments. The servo amp could tell,
> (2) Can you tell when deceleration ends and acceleration begins?
> Remember, your eyes are closed (no peeking).
but in general it doesn't care much, either. Shortly before speed drops
to zero, the voltage across the armature terminals will pass through
zero, and the motor will change from negative resistance to positive.
The armature resistance causes this to happen just before the armature
actually reverses direction.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Mike Snodgrass
2002-03-19 07:00:36 UTC
capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-19 07:18:14 UTC
Re: capacitor
Mike Snodgrass
2002-03-19 08:01:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-19 09:46:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-19 10:15:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] capacitor
Mike Snodgrass
2002-03-19 10:39:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-19 11:55:40 UTC
Re: capacitor
Stan Stocker
2002-03-19 18:56:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
gnrshelton
2002-03-19 19:24:18 UTC
Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-19 21:25:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Les Watts
2002-03-20 07:09:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Marcus & Eva
2002-03-20 08:15:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-03-20 08:18:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-20 08:32:17 UTC
Re: capacitor
Mike Snodgrass
2002-03-20 08:47:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-20 10:19:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Les Watts
2002-03-20 11:16:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-20 12:34:44 UTC
Re: capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-20 14:08:07 UTC
Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-20 22:18:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-20 23:17:42 UTC
Re: capacitor
Les Watts
2002-03-21 08:50:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-21 10:01:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-21 10:13:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Les Watts
2002-03-21 10:35:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
mariss92705
2002-03-21 12:31:33 UTC
Re: capacitor
Les Watts
2002-03-21 13:52:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Tim Goldstein
2002-03-21 13:59:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Les Newell
2002-03-21 14:35:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor
Jon Elson
2002-03-21 22:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: capacitor