Re: formula ?
Posted by
dave_ace_me
on 2002-04-15 19:32:37 UTC
Hi Jon,
I thought about this as I was trying to conceptualize it.
If my 50 oz/in stepper takes 2,000 steps per inch, then that SAME
2,000 steps per inch generate so much force, regardless if it is on a
rack or a leadscrew or timing belt.
Friction and alignment and other losses will effect the delivered
force, but theoretically, it is the same.
If you want more, get one of them big A$$ steppers 802 oz stepper
from Dan.
Dave
I thought about this as I was trying to conceptualize it.
If my 50 oz/in stepper takes 2,000 steps per inch, then that SAME
2,000 steps per inch generate so much force, regardless if it is on a
rack or a leadscrew or timing belt.
Friction and alignment and other losses will effect the delivered
force, but theoretically, it is the same.
If you want more, get one of them big A$$ steppers 802 oz stepper
from Dan.
Dave
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
> batwings@i... wrote:
>
> > I don't think this is correct.
> >
> > At 06:14 AM 4/15/02 +0000, you wrote:
> > >docholliday01201 wrote:
> > >
> > >> once again, who knows the formula for converting rotational
torque at
> > >> the motor-to linear force at the table ??
> > >
> > >Its really simple. Consider the leadscrew to be a drum pulling
a string,
> > >where the circumference of the drum is equal to the lead of the
screw.
> > >If you have a 5 TPI screw, that is the equivalent of a drum with
> > circumference
> > >of .200 in, or .0637" diameter or .0318" radius. If the motor
produces 10
> > In-Lb,
> > >that is the same as 10 Lbs pull at a radius of one inch. This
will translate
> > >to 10 / .0318 = 314.16 Lbs linear force on the table! Pretty
amazing, these
> > >ball screws!
>
> How can it not be correct? Two eqivalent mechanisms (neglecting
friction)
> should produce the same results. A drum pulling string or a screw
moving
> a linear slide by the same distance per revolution, have to be
equivalent.
> (This is only true for ballscrews, because other screws have
significant
> friction which increases under load.)
>
> Unless someone can point out where I went wrong, I stand by this
> calculation.
>
> Jon
Discussion Thread
docholliday01201
2002-04-14 07:20:12 UTC
formula ?
n4onl
2002-04-14 08:57:11 UTC
Re: formula ?
dave_ace_me
2002-04-14 13:14:03 UTC
Re: formula ?
batwings@i...
2002-04-14 18:41:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: formula ?
Jon Elson
2002-04-14 23:01:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] formula ?
Jon Elson
2002-04-14 23:13:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: formula ?
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 04:46:18 UTC
Re: formula ?
batwings@i...
2002-04-15 04:51:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] formula ?
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 06:18:52 UTC
leadscrew power calculation ( was Re: formula ?
Jon Elson
2002-04-15 10:35:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] formula ?
Jon Elson
2002-04-15 10:41:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: formula ?
Les Watts
2002-04-15 11:48:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] formula ?
dave_ace_me
2002-04-15 19:32:37 UTC
Re: formula ?
ballendo
2002-04-16 18:26:29 UTC
Re: formula ?
dave_ace_me
2002-04-16 21:01:06 UTC
Re: formula ?
ballendo
2002-04-17 02:51:33 UTC
Re: formula ?