Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-05-30 16:56:27 UTC
In a message dated 30-May-02 16:04:59 Central Daylight Time, KM6VV@...
writes:
near each other, so I put a two-terminal solder-lug thing kinda nearly
between, and soldered a 1000 uF/50 V. cap. to those, and then connected that
to both 210's (+) and (-) terminals with #20 wire, tinned-ends!. And, of
course, to the 24 VDC (unreg.!) supply.
If you had only ONE 210, and no place for the solder-terminals, you might
neatly solder the insulated power-supply lines to the cap's leads, slip
shrink-tubing over "all that", leaving about 0.2" nekkid, and connect those
exposed ends to the Gecko's terminals #1 and #2.
This detail is a GOOD example of how "being NEAT" is important to function!
Sloppy loose connections, and/or lotsa extra wire slack flopping about will
NOT do good things!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> Yeah, the 470uF/100V caps are a little large to mount right on theMark: As my application had TWO axes (X & Y), there were TWO G210's very
> Gecko's. Put some insulation on the radial leads, it'll work.
>
>
near each other, so I put a two-terminal solder-lug thing kinda nearly
between, and soldered a 1000 uF/50 V. cap. to those, and then connected that
to both 210's (+) and (-) terminals with #20 wire, tinned-ends!. And, of
course, to the 24 VDC (unreg.!) supply.
If you had only ONE 210, and no place for the solder-terminals, you might
neatly solder the insulated power-supply lines to the cap's leads, slip
shrink-tubing over "all that", leaving about 0.2" nekkid, and connect those
exposed ends to the Gecko's terminals #1 and #2.
This detail is a GOOD example of how "being NEAT" is important to function!
Sloppy loose connections, and/or lotsa extra wire slack flopping about will
NOT do good things!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
markpowerplus
2002-05-30 12:43:19 UTC
question
hugo_cnc
2002-05-30 13:04:12 UTC
Re: question
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-05-30 14:02:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-30 16:56:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question
Doug Fortune
2002-05-30 19:39:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question