Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Anilam Conversion ( was Digest 2382)
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-06-26 19:21:43 UTC
Bob Bachman wrote:
screws have gotten worn, but you can put new balls into it and cut the backlash.
Jon
> Larry,Well, the Anilam control didn't have a problem with it. It may be that the
>
> I have a Supermax mill with what sounds like the same Anilam Crusader II
> control. The
> control is gone but the servo amps, motors, ps, and scales are OK. I have been
> considering the Gecko 340 drivers but I'm concerned about the lost motion
> between
> leadscrews and the linear table scales might cause excess hunting of the
> motors.
> Have you had this problem?
screws have gotten worn, but you can put new balls into it and cut the backlash.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ray Henry
2002-06-15 05:24:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digest Number 2382
f32cpe
2002-06-26 08:25:38 UTC
Re: Digest Number 2382
Jon Elson
2002-06-26 10:48:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 2382
Larry Ragan
2002-06-26 11:45:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digest Number 2382
Bob Bachman
2002-06-26 17:50:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Anilam Conversion ( was Digest 2382)
Jon Elson
2002-06-26 19:21:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Anilam Conversion ( was Digest 2382)
Larry Ragan
2002-07-02 10:49:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Anilam Conversion ( was Digest 2382)