Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc
Posted by
bjammin@i...
on 2002-07-17 05:49:13 UTC
At 12:02 PM 7/17/02 -0000, you wrote:
thru with it what others seem to have to go thru. It is totally
inconceivable to me that it will either lose offset values or sum them up
in some arcane way when you use another ordinary control function! That is
not only ineffective and counterproductive, it's well past damned
dangerous. My program writes them to a file on disc and they can only be
altered by the operator overwriting them or editing the file. Thats the way
all other sytems seem to work, and I don't think I'm missing anything.
help but be happy with.
unless you have a deity to manage the individual programmers.
I will never have a problem in implementing the way any flavor of Gcode
runs, because I wrote the interpretor I'm using. However, I haven't had to
run Gcode yet anyway, as my system also uses an alternative fully
implemented command set.
If you have an answer to the question I posed, I'd sure like to hear it.
Regards, Hoyt
Anti-virus request: Please do not add this email addy to address books
Belfab CNC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/belfab/belfab.html
US Best MC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/best.html
Camping/Caving - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/caving.html
Redneck blues: Dog drove off in pickup truck, but left the wife behind
>1- Linux is just plain better (no arguments please, you are entitledLinux is basically useless to me unless I run EMC and I intend not to go
>to disagree).
thru with it what others seem to have to go thru. It is totally
inconceivable to me that it will either lose offset values or sum them up
in some arcane way when you use another ordinary control function! That is
not only ineffective and counterproductive, it's well past damned
dangerous. My program writes them to a file on disc and they can only be
altered by the operator overwriting them or editing the file. Thats the way
all other sytems seem to work, and I don't think I'm missing anything.
>2- The designers used a REAL-TIME OS (the RT-Linux extensions) toThe advantage to me is entirely theoretical.
>make sure things happened.
>3- I looked at other control software -- I liked EMC better.I'm doing just fine with my own stuff which having written myself I can't
help but be happy with.
>That said, I would like to also point out that the whole reason EMCThere can never be any real and lasting consistency in open source code,
>came to be was to bring consistancy to CNC. The field is replete with
>controllers that do things different than the next one. G-CODE will
>not (necessarily) run the same on different brands of machines.
unless you have a deity to manage the individual programmers.
I will never have a problem in implementing the way any flavor of Gcode
runs, because I wrote the interpretor I'm using. However, I haven't had to
run Gcode yet anyway, as my system also uses an alternative fully
implemented command set.
If you have an answer to the question I posed, I'd sure like to hear it.
Regards, Hoyt
Anti-virus request: Please do not add this email addy to address books
Belfab CNC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/belfab/belfab.html
US Best MC - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/best.html
Camping/Caving - http://www.freeyellow.com/members/batwings/caving.html
Redneck blues: Dog drove off in pickup truck, but left the wife behind
Discussion Thread
Joel Jacobs
2002-07-16 13:03:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92
bjammin@i...
2002-07-17 04:19:08 UTC
emc
the_dutros
2002-07-17 05:02:30 UTC
Re: emc
bjammin@i...
2002-07-17 05:49:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc
dakota8833
2002-07-17 06:33:27 UTC
Re: emc
bjammin@i...
2002-07-17 08:03:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc
Brian Pitt
2002-07-17 10:19:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-07-17 20:17:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc