Re: Belts & Pulleys
Posted by
gittt2000
on 2002-07-19 08:31:51 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., Peter <prenolds@s...> wrote:
rather than a degree of rotation?. If it stays constant then it
suggests a big diameter pulley will suffer much less backlash than a
smaller one, and given that the pulley is driving a leadscrew it's
the rotational backlash we are interested in.
> backlash for two 20 groove pulleys with 6.6lb belt tension is aboutThat's interesting - I wonder why it is stated as a linear distance
> .012" for a 3mm GT belt and .029" for a 3mm HTD belt. Sounds like a
> lot!
rather than a degree of rotation?. If it stays constant then it
suggests a big diameter pulley will suffer much less backlash than a
smaller one, and given that the pulley is driving a leadscrew it's
the rotational backlash we are interested in.
Discussion Thread
Jason Cox
2002-07-18 21:29:45 UTC
Belts & Pulleys
Peter
2002-07-19 07:55:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belts & Pulleys
gittt2000
2002-07-19 08:31:51 UTC
Re: Belts & Pulleys
Jon Elson
2002-07-19 09:07:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belts & Pulleys
hugo_cnc
2002-07-19 09:35:13 UTC
Re: Belts & Pulleys
Peter
2002-07-19 09:53:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belts & Pulleys
CL
2002-07-19 10:13:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belts & Pulleys
Jon Elson
2002-07-19 22:39:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Belts & Pulleys
Jon Elson
2002-07-19 22:43:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Belts & Pulleys