Re: Waterjet project - access to
Posted by
kdoney_63021
on 2002-07-30 07:33:28 UTC
A garnet recovery system is (compared to the rest) relatively cheap.
I believe the "easiest" way to the pressure we need is with an engine
driven pump. They are more efficient and easier to maintain than
intensifiers. A 20 HP direct pump is as efficient as a 50 HP
intensifier. My target pressure is 35K PSI. Has anyone seen a veined
pump go that high or just pistons?
I believe the "easiest" way to the pressure we need is with an engine
driven pump. They are more efficient and easier to maintain than
intensifiers. A 20 HP direct pump is as efficient as a 50 HP
intensifier. My target pressure is 35K PSI. Has anyone seen a veined
pump go that high or just pistons?
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "turbulatordude" <davemucha@j...> wrote:
> In a perfect world, one could use those glass shards to cut more
> stuff.
>
Discussion Thread
kdoney_63021
2002-07-26 17:51:17 UTC
Waterjet project
Dave Lantz
2002-07-26 18:19:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Waterjet project
Jon Elson
2002-07-26 22:46:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Waterjet project
Brian Pitt
2002-07-27 00:10:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Waterjet project
John
2002-07-27 05:36:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Waterjet project
turbulatordude
2002-07-27 06:46:04 UTC
Re: Waterjet project
turbulatordude
2002-07-27 07:15:07 UTC
Re: Waterjet project - access to
Dave Lantz
2002-07-29 05:01:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Waterjet project - access to
turbulatordude
2002-07-29 06:35:39 UTC
Re: Waterjet project - access to
Dave Lantz
2002-07-29 07:22:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Waterjet project - access to
Brian
2002-07-29 19:44:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Waterjet project - access to
turbulatordude
2002-07-30 05:19:25 UTC
Re: Waterjet project - access to
Dave Lantz
2002-07-30 05:24:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Waterjet project - access to
kdoney_63021
2002-07-30 07:33:28 UTC
Re: Waterjet project - access to