Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Posted by
Charles Gallo
on 2000-01-29 17:06:24 UTC
At 05:32 PM 2000-01-29 -0500, you wrote:
At this point, you might as well wait for the 2.4 kernel, as that seems to
be around the corner
Charlie
><snip><snip>
>RH 6.x is based on the 2.2.x kernel, while RH 5.2 was the last of the 2.0.x
>kernel releases. There are versions of the RT-Linux kernel patches for the
>2.2.x kernels, and there is a version of the EMC software that has been
>modified to work with them. As I remember there was still one outstanding bug
>that had something to do with clocks (time-of-day or real-time) that kept
>this version from being used widely. Converting to the 2.2.x kernel IS a high
>priority though and I expect you'll see some movement on this front in the
>next few months (maybe sooner).
At this point, you might as well wait for the 2.4 kernel, as that seems to
be around the corner
Charlie
Discussion Thread
Bertho Boman
2000-01-29 08:53:48 UTC
Linux-EMC suggestion
Steve Carlisle
2000-01-29 10:58:05 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
hansw
2000-01-29 10:43:51 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
WAnliker@a...
2000-01-29 11:40:44 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Matt Shaver
2000-01-29 14:32:28 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Ian Wright
2000-01-29 15:04:07 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Bertho Boman
2000-01-29 16:12:13 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Charles Gallo
2000-01-29 17:06:24 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Matt Shaver
2000-01-29 17:27:03 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Charles Gallo
2000-01-29 18:53:56 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Jon Elson
2000-01-29 23:17:14 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion