CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Linux-EMC suggestion

Posted by Matt Shaver
on 2000-01-29 17:27:03 UTC
> From: Charles Gallo <Charlie@...>
>
> At 05:32 PM 2000-01-29 -0500, you wrote:
> ><snip>
> >RH 6.x is based on the 2.2.x kernel, while RH 5.2 was the last of the
2.0.x
> >kernel releases. There are versions of the RT-Linux kernel patches for the
> >2.2.x kernels, and there is a version of the EMC software that has been
> >modified to work with them. As I remember there was still one outstanding
bug
> >that had something to do with clocks (time-of-day or real-time) that kept
> >this version from being used widely. Converting to the 2.2.x kernel IS a
high
> >priority though and I expect you'll see some movement on this front in the
> >next few months (maybe sooner).
> <snip>
>
> At this point, you might as well wait for the 2.4 kernel, as that seems to
> be around the corner

Supposedly that's when the RT-Linux patches get merged into the regular
kernel distribution and a lot of this mess goes away! It depends upon whether
Linus Torvalds thinks it's important or not. We'll see...

Matt

Discussion Thread

Bertho Boman 2000-01-29 08:53:48 UTC Linux-EMC suggestion Steve Carlisle 2000-01-29 10:58:05 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion hansw 2000-01-29 10:43:51 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion WAnliker@a... 2000-01-29 11:40:44 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Matt Shaver 2000-01-29 14:32:28 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Ian Wright 2000-01-29 15:04:07 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Bertho Boman 2000-01-29 16:12:13 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Charles Gallo 2000-01-29 17:06:24 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Matt Shaver 2000-01-29 17:27:03 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Charles Gallo 2000-01-29 18:53:56 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion Jon Elson 2000-01-29 23:17:14 UTC Re: Linux-EMC suggestion