Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 2000-01-29 17:27:03 UTC
> From: Charles Gallo <Charlie@...>2.0.x
>
> At 05:32 PM 2000-01-29 -0500, you wrote:
> ><snip>
> >RH 6.x is based on the 2.2.x kernel, while RH 5.2 was the last of the
> >kernel releases. There are versions of the RT-Linux kernel patches for thebug
> >2.2.x kernels, and there is a version of the EMC software that has been
> >modified to work with them. As I remember there was still one outstanding
> >that had something to do with clocks (time-of-day or real-time) that kepthigh
> >this version from being used widely. Converting to the 2.2.x kernel IS a
> >priority though and I expect you'll see some movement on this front in theSupposedly that's when the RT-Linux patches get merged into the regular
> >next few months (maybe sooner).
> <snip>
>
> At this point, you might as well wait for the 2.4 kernel, as that seems to
> be around the corner
kernel distribution and a lot of this mess goes away! It depends upon whether
Linus Torvalds thinks it's important or not. We'll see...
Matt
Discussion Thread
Bertho Boman
2000-01-29 08:53:48 UTC
Linux-EMC suggestion
Steve Carlisle
2000-01-29 10:58:05 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
hansw
2000-01-29 10:43:51 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
WAnliker@a...
2000-01-29 11:40:44 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Matt Shaver
2000-01-29 14:32:28 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Ian Wright
2000-01-29 15:04:07 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Bertho Boman
2000-01-29 16:12:13 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Charles Gallo
2000-01-29 17:06:24 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Matt Shaver
2000-01-29 17:27:03 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Charles Gallo
2000-01-29 18:53:56 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion
Jon Elson
2000-01-29 23:17:14 UTC
Re: Linux-EMC suggestion