Re: Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
Posted by
Alan Rothenbush
on 2002-09-15 14:32:11 UTC
Mariss;
Thanks for the reply.
Given your guesstimate of 30 oz-in, I may elect to not use any reduction
pulleys, which should help the speed. The table only has 3 inches or so of
travel, so these small numbers are less troubling than first appears.
I could run it unipolar with a genuine constant current source on the top
end ( as opposed to an R/L drive ). I should have some LM783s around .. good
for 75 volts and a single resistor turns them into a CC source. I'd just have
to find some high voltage driver transistors .. out of an off-line switching
power supply, perhaps.
But it would seem to me that if wired in bipolar mode, I'd cut the inductance
in half. With a suitable drive, that should get me double the speed and twice
the holding power ( more or less ) as in unipolar mode. I understand that
reality might well rear its ugly head, but this SHOULD be an improvement, no ?
And that being the case, any thoughts on how would I rewire the motor ?
Alan
Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta
Thanks for the reply.
Given your guesstimate of 30 oz-in, I may elect to not use any reduction
pulleys, which should help the speed. The table only has 3 inches or so of
travel, so these small numbers are less troubling than first appears.
I could run it unipolar with a genuine constant current source on the top
end ( as opposed to an R/L drive ). I should have some LM783s around .. good
for 75 volts and a single resistor turns them into a CC source. I'd just have
to find some high voltage driver transistors .. out of an off-line switching
power supply, perhaps.
But it would seem to me that if wired in bipolar mode, I'd cut the inductance
in half. With a suitable drive, that should get me double the speed and twice
the holding power ( more or less ) as in unipolar mode. I understand that
reality might well rear its ugly head, but this SHOULD be an improvement, no ?
And that being the case, any thoughts on how would I rewire the motor ?
Alan
> Speed certainly won't be an issue with those motors because there--
> won't be any particularly with a 4:1 reduction.
>
> What you have there are some size 17 motors, probably about 30 in-oz
> in holding torque. I'm guessing you have a 20TPI leadscrew so you can
> calculate "push" in lbs as being 2pi * 20TPI * 4 * 30 in-oz /16 or
> 942 lbs (neglecting screw efficiency). The problem will be speed; at
> 24VDC those motors may manage 3 revs per second at best. Figuring 80
> revs per inch (TPI * reduction ratio of 4:1) you will get 3/80 inches
> per second or 2.25" per minute.
>
> There isn't much point in rewiring the motors because you will still
> have way to much inductance to make it worthwhile to run them with a
> switching type drive.
>
> You may wish to think about re-motoring with higher current motors.
> If you insist on running them anyway, plan on using an R/L drive.
>
> Mariss
Alan Rothenbush | The Spartans do not ask the number of the
Academic Computing Services | enemy, only where they are.
Simon Fraser University |
Burnaby, B.C., Canada | Agix of Sparta
Discussion Thread
Alan Rothenbush
2002-09-15 12:21:14 UTC
Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
mariss92705
2002-09-15 13:24:31 UTC
Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
Alan Rothenbush
2002-09-15 14:32:11 UTC
Re: Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
mariss92705
2002-09-15 15:58:40 UTC
Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
Alan Rothenbush
2002-09-15 16:51:49 UTC
Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers
ahlee1010
2002-09-17 16:25:21 UTC
Re: Two related questions, Sherlines and Steppers