Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: chipload
Posted by
Raymond Heckert
on 2002-09-22 19:23:26 UTC
Sorry, but that's basically it. Chipload refers only to the chip
thickness, not the volume of the chip. It relates to the feedrate, and
number of flutes, and RPM of cutter.
RayHex
----------
thickness, not the volume of the chip. It relates to the feedrate, and
number of flutes, and RPM of cutter.
RayHex
----------
> From: keongsan <keongsan@...>SNIP
>reasonable?
> For example, if we have a case of a cutter with a specific chipload
> of say, 0.0025" at a particular feed. Now we use a cutter with double
> the width (or double the depth of the milling cutter) if chipload is
> express as a linear dimension, there will be no change in chipload
> although my feeble mind tell me that the power requirement (or
> something else) will change. So if we calculate the feed rate based
> on a specific chipload (linear dimension) that feed rate will be
> independent of cutter thickness/depth, which doesn't sound
Discussion Thread
keongsan
2002-09-21 19:36:27 UTC
chipload
Tim Goldstein
2002-09-21 20:31:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] chipload
Raymond Heckert
2002-09-21 20:33:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] chipload
Jon Elson
2002-09-21 21:48:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] chipload
keongsan
2002-09-21 23:00:05 UTC
Re: chipload
hugo_cnc
2002-09-22 06:33:03 UTC
Re: chipload
Marcus & Eva
2002-09-22 10:34:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: chipload
Jon Elson
2002-09-22 14:42:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: chipload
Raymond Heckert
2002-09-22 19:23:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: chipload