Re: Linux vs. DOS
Posted by
Tim Goldstein
on 1999-05-31 11:54:07 UTC
Matt,
Thanks again for your kindness in helping.
Here is where I am at now. The problem was that I removed the !/bin/csh -f
line as I was originally getting a message about invalid parameter and the
csh parameter list would appear. So, I figured the line was commented out so
that removing it shouldn't hurt and that error went away. Silly me!!. I
tried to put the line back in and the original error returned even when I
copy and pasted it out of the run.stepper file (which produces plenty of
errors, just not the csh error). I ended up opening the run.stepper file for
edit and deleting all except the first line and saving it as run.mystepper
in the /usr/local/nist/emc directory and then running "chmod o+x
run.mystepper" command that Jon gave me. Now I could execute run.mystepper
with out any errors so I opened it for edit and copy and pasted all of the
run.64step378 file into it except for the first line that I had from the
run.stepper file.
So, here is where I am now.:
I boot up and go to a terminal window in X and issue lsmod I see 2 modules,
one for the network card and another that is a 4 digit number that starts
with 8 and I can't remember the rest.
Next I switch to /usr/local/nist/emc and enter the command ./run.mystepper
This seems to start out fine and I see starting emc and then installing
motion module. Then I get the following error message:
segmentation fault
rmmod: steppermod: devise or resource busy
rmmod: rtl_sched is in use
And that is where it leaves me.
If I then enter lsmod I see steppermod and rtl_sched in the list with the
previous 2 entries. steppermod is marked as [uninitialized]. If I try rmmod
manually, I get the error noted above.
Any ideas of what I should try now.
Thanks again,
Tim
[Denver, CO]
Thanks again for your kindness in helping.
Here is where I am at now. The problem was that I removed the !/bin/csh -f
line as I was originally getting a message about invalid parameter and the
csh parameter list would appear. So, I figured the line was commented out so
that removing it shouldn't hurt and that error went away. Silly me!!. I
tried to put the line back in and the original error returned even when I
copy and pasted it out of the run.stepper file (which produces plenty of
errors, just not the csh error). I ended up opening the run.stepper file for
edit and deleting all except the first line and saving it as run.mystepper
in the /usr/local/nist/emc directory and then running "chmod o+x
run.mystepper" command that Jon gave me. Now I could execute run.mystepper
with out any errors so I opened it for edit and copy and pasted all of the
run.64step378 file into it except for the first line that I had from the
run.stepper file.
So, here is where I am now.:
I boot up and go to a terminal window in X and issue lsmod I see 2 modules,
one for the network card and another that is a 4 digit number that starts
with 8 and I can't remember the rest.
Next I switch to /usr/local/nist/emc and enter the command ./run.mystepper
This seems to start out fine and I see starting emc and then installing
motion module. Then I get the following error message:
segmentation fault
rmmod: steppermod: devise or resource busy
rmmod: rtl_sched is in use
And that is where it leaves me.
If I then enter lsmod I see steppermod and rtl_sched in the list with the
previous 2 entries. steppermod is marked as [uninitialized]. If I try rmmod
manually, I get the error noted above.
Any ideas of what I should try now.
Thanks again,
Tim
[Denver, CO]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Shaver [mailto:mshaver@...]
> Sent: Sunday, May 30, 1999 9:49 PM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com
> Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux vs. DOS
>
>
> From: "Matt Shaver" <mshaver@...>
>
> > Well, I played around a little more and applied the Microsoft
> trick (shut
> > down and reboot) and booted back to the original kernel (I left it as an
> > option in Lilo along with an option to boot to Windows 95). I tried
> running
> > insmod and it worked as it should. I then booted to the rtlinux kernel
> and
> > now it seems that I can issue insmod from the command line and it works.
> > Unfortunately, when I try ./run.64step378 I still get a number of
> "command
> > not found" errors. Is there a way to put in an echo or something in the
> > run.64step378 file so I can get an idea what the commands are that can't
> be
> > found.
>
> Hey, quit gettin' ahead of me here! ;)
>
> 1. Just put in lines like:
>
> echo "your_message_goes_here"
>
> This is done a lot in the run.64step378 file already.
>
> 2. Make sure that the line:
>
> #!/bin/csh -f
>
> is the very FIRST line in the file (no blank lines above)!
>
> 3. Check the plat/linux_2_0_36/bin/ directory to see that mmio,
> mmtask, and
> xemc are there.
>
> 4. Check that the path to the EMC code is /usr/local/nist/emc. Note that
> 'cd /usr/local/nist/emc' is on of the first lines in run.64step378.
>
> I'm here till late, so you can even call if you want.
>
> Matt
> (410) 521-3715
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> It's finally here! What's your opinion?
> http://www.onelist.com
> Create a Star Wars discussion group at ONElist.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for
> the discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
>
Discussion Thread
Andrew Werby
1999-05-29 04:16:11 UTC
Linux vs. DOS
john@x...
1999-05-29 15:07:09 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-29 21:21:47 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-29 21:29:06 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-29 22:27:47 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 00:12:13 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-30 15:39:08 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-30 20:37:55 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 20:35:33 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 20:48:44 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-30 23:19:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 11:54:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 11:54:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 12:12:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 12:17:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 13:30:23 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 14:13:26 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 16:00:38 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 16:00:51 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 17:32:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 17:33:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 17:43:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Falck
1999-05-31 19:55:12 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 22:48:46 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-31 22:58:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 23:32:27 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 23:32:29 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 23:32:50 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-01 00:38:11 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-01 06:32:41 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 09:45:52 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-01 12:16:50 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Ian W. Wright
1999-06-01 12:37:43 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 17:03:26 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 22:05:54 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-02 06:30:25 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-02 06:42:14 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Buchanan, James (Jim)
1999-06-02 13:01:09 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-02 13:33:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 14:26:20 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 14:45:01 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-02 15:01:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 23:19:44 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-03 00:26:35 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Ian W. Wright
1999-06-04 13:47:19 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-05 16:54:15 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-05 17:34:22 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-05 23:39:08 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-05 23:41:51 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-05 23:42:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 00:03:27 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 00:30:52 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 01:00:46 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 01:37:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Falck
1999-06-06 05:51:38 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 17:16:33 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 21:05:20 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 22:06:24 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 22:30:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 22:57:18 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 23:16:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 23:29:41 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 23:46:32 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-07 21:59:53 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-08 22:07:54 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-09 06:18:23 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS