Re: Linux vs. DOS
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 1999-06-02 13:33:07 UTC
"Buchanan, James (Jim)" wrote:
control is out, as the supported servo card is ISA. 6 MB is awfully
small. Linux would probably run (badly), but it really is too small
to do serious work in. The 60 MB hard drive is hopeless.
I was not able to put a reasonable subset of linux on a 600 MB
disk. The kernel and a couple small utilities can fit on a floppy,
but if you want compilers, libraries, help files, kernel source, etc.
then it gets very big. Yes, you need the real-time patch for the
specific version of Linux you would be running.
Most people who have EMC running are using 1 GB + disks,
32 MB ram, and Pentium CPU's. I'm pretty sure you can get
EMC running under X windows in 16 MB, but that leaves little
memory left over for anything else, like another xterm with
emacs.
> From: "Buchanan, James (Jim)" <jambuch@...>Probably not. I don't think MCA systems are supported. Servo
>
> Hi:
> Just returned form the University surplus equipment sale where I
> purchased a skid of PC gear for $15 because I needed a new paper tray
> for my laser printer. Besides getting a Laser Printer which I have not
> tested yet, I got a PS/2 8555 which is a 386sx 6meg ram and 60mg
> hardrive.
>
> Can I run Linux on this system? If so how do I easly get a copy and
> what version do I need? What additional tools do I need (compilers)? Do
> I need realtime code? If so where do i get it? and what version. My
> plans are to build a stepper motor drive for a small mill. But first I
> just want to run some stepper motors to get a better understanding of
> CAM. I design my parts using Autocad.
control is out, as the supported servo card is ISA. 6 MB is awfully
small. Linux would probably run (badly), but it really is too small
to do serious work in. The 60 MB hard drive is hopeless.
I was not able to put a reasonable subset of linux on a 600 MB
disk. The kernel and a couple small utilities can fit on a floppy,
but if you want compilers, libraries, help files, kernel source, etc.
then it gets very big. Yes, you need the real-time patch for the
specific version of Linux you would be running.
Most people who have EMC running are using 1 GB + disks,
32 MB ram, and Pentium CPU's. I'm pretty sure you can get
EMC running under X windows in 16 MB, but that leaves little
memory left over for anything else, like another xterm with
emacs.
Discussion Thread
Andrew Werby
1999-05-29 04:16:11 UTC
Linux vs. DOS
john@x...
1999-05-29 15:07:09 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-29 21:21:47 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-29 21:29:06 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-29 22:27:47 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 00:12:13 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-30 15:39:08 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-30 20:37:55 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 20:35:33 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-30 20:48:44 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-30 23:19:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 11:54:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 11:54:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 12:12:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 12:17:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 13:30:23 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 14:13:26 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 16:00:38 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 16:00:51 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 17:32:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 17:33:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 17:43:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Falck
1999-05-31 19:55:12 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 22:48:46 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-05-31 22:58:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 23:32:27 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-05-31 23:32:29 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-05-31 23:32:50 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-01 00:38:11 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-01 06:32:41 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 09:45:52 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-01 12:16:50 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Ian W. Wright
1999-06-01 12:37:43 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 17:03:26 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-01 22:05:54 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-02 06:30:25 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-02 06:42:14 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Buchanan, James (Jim)
1999-06-02 13:01:09 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-02 13:33:07 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 14:26:20 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 14:45:01 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-02 15:01:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-02 23:19:44 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-03 00:26:35 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Ian W. Wright
1999-06-04 13:47:19 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-05 16:54:15 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-05 17:34:22 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-05 23:39:08 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-05 23:41:51 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-05 23:42:39 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 00:03:27 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 00:30:52 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 01:00:46 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 01:37:57 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Falck
1999-06-06 05:51:38 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 17:16:33 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 21:05:20 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 22:06:24 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 22:30:17 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-06 22:57:18 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Matt Shaver
1999-06-06 23:16:03 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 23:29:41 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Jon Elson
1999-06-06 23:46:32 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-07 21:59:53 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Tim Goldstein
1999-06-08 22:07:54 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS
Dan Mauch
1999-06-09 06:18:23 UTC
Re: Linux vs. DOS