CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Linux vs. DOS

Posted by Dan Mauch
on 1999-06-02 06:30:25 UTC
Maxnc
1M03
2 XS
3XD
4YS
5YD
6ZS
7ZD
8AS
9AD
10LIMIT+
11M06
12LIMIT-
13hOME SWITCH SENSOR g61
14M7
15M8
DESKNC
2XS
3XD
4YS
5YD
6ZS
7ZD
8AS
9AD
10 X HOME
12Y HOME
13 HOME
15LIMIT
14 16 17 RELAYS

DAN
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Goldstein <timg@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 01, 1999 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Linux vs. DOS


>From: "Tim Goldstein" <timg@...>
>
>> From: "Matt Shaver" <mshaver@...>
>>
>> I agree, plus the DanCAM pinout seems to have two digital I/O
>> bits on the
>> same port with the step and direction signals. Also, I notice
>> the popular
>> pinouts don't have home switches either, so this whole area
>> needs to be
>> rethought. See:
>>
>> http://www.super-tech.com/root/scxyzsup.htm
>>
>> for a chart of popular pinouts.
>
>Actually, the DanCAD pinout has provisions for limit switches (All axis's +
>& - are ganged together to one input) and for home switches on all 3 axis's
>along with 3 (if I remember correctly) relays. The newest version of DeskNC
>DOS supports 4 axis's with home switches on all and limit switches all
>ganged to 1 input along with 3 or 4 (don't remember which) relays. You may
>want to go to the page I am putting together on hooking up a controller at
>http://www.ktmarketing.com/parallel.html and get the file that that is
>connected to the "Download this .dxf file". It will give you the pin
>assignment for DanCAD along with a change to make the same setup work for
>DeskNC DOS.
>
>> > The correct axis's now move and I can make all 3 of them
>> go. Whoopee!!
>> > The only problem is one of the axis's moves in the wrong
>> direction. Guess
>> I
>> > need to know how to configure the direction. Another
>> problem is that the
>> > physical movement is much larger than the amount entered in the
>> controller.
>> > My X and Y settings are 4000 steps per inch and my Z
>> setting is 5600 per
>> > inch. Another parameter I need to learn to set.
>>
>> See:
>>
>> http://www.isd.cme.nist.gov/projects/emc/emcsoft.html
>>
>> way down the page for a description of how to set up the .ini file
>> parameters. I think you need to look at the INPUT_SCALE
>> parameter to get
>> the scaling right, and the OUTPUT_SCALE to get the direction
>> right. For
>> INPUT_SCALE I think you need it set to 4000 for X and Y, and
>> 5600 for the
>> Z. To reverse the directions change OUTPUT_SCALE = 1.000 0.001 to
>> OUTPUT_SCALE = -1.000 0.001 for the backwards axis. I'm not
>> sure of the
>> implications for you of that 0,001 in the OUTPUT_SCALE
>> parameter, I'll have
>> to ask Fred.
>>
>
>I read through the page and couldn't quite figure out how the numbers
>related to a stepper setup as all the descriptions were for servos. I will
>make the changes, see what happens and let you know.
>
>
>> > The default fast move (G00) speed is WAY too fast for my
>> poor steppers.
>> They
>> > just make a terrible groan trying to rotate at that speed.
>> Again, another
>> > thing I need to learn how to configure.
>>
>> Reduce the DEFAULT_VELOCITY, DEFAULT_ACCELERATION, MAX_VELOCITY and
>> MAX_ACCELERATION parameters. Velocity is in inches per second
>> and I think
>> acceleration is in/sec/sec. I would think a velocity of 1 and an
>> acceleration of .1 would be a starting point for you (this is
>> a guess).
>>
>
>Again, I will make these changes and report back.
>
>
>> > When the program hit a line with a G42 cutter comp entry I
>> got the error
>> > message "convert_cutter_compensation_on error 43 blah,
>> blah, blah"(OK, I
>> > didn't write it down). This is even with a line in the
>> program to specify
>> > the tool (T1).
>>
>> I think I need to see the code, the error, and what's in your
>> tool table
>> for this one.
>
>I will try to get it all together and send it to you tonight.
>
>> > I am mighty confused about how to step through a program as the step
>> > function only seems to work once you press run and then
>> pause. Any idea
>> how
>> > I step into a program instead of having to panic and click
>> pause before 4
>> > lines have processed?
>>
>> Sorry, that's how it works for now and there are other single
>> stepping bugs
>> you haven't experienced yet. This is an area of continuing
>> development.
>> Very soon there will be a big change to the motion control
>> code that speeds
>> up the block processing rate, and this also affects the
>> single stepping
>> problem.
>
>I can live with it for now. I just wanted to make sure it wasn't my lack of
>understanding that was causing the problem.
>
>> > Major problem. If I only move the X or Y axis all is fine.
>> If I move the
>> Z
>> > axis I start to get random very ragged movement in the X
>> axis and any
>> > movements issued for the X axis are interpreted incorrectly
>> while this
>> > random movement is occurring. If I make some more movements
>> on the Z axis
>> > the X axis movement problem will randomly go away and then return.
>>
>> Try getting the .ini parameters right and see if this goes
>> away. If not,
>> we'll examine this more carefully.
>>
>
>I keep you posted.
>
>Thanks again,
>
>Tim
>[Denver, CO]
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Give back to your community through "Grow to Give."
>http://www.ONElist.com
>See homepage for details.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>welcome to CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@..., an unmodulated list for the
discussion of shop built systems in the above catagories.
>

Discussion Thread

Andrew Werby 1999-05-29 04:16:11 UTC Linux vs. DOS john@x... 1999-05-29 15:07:09 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-05-29 21:21:47 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-29 21:29:06 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-29 22:27:47 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-30 00:12:13 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-30 15:39:08 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-30 20:37:55 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-30 20:35:33 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-30 20:48:44 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-05-30 23:19:07 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 11:54:03 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 11:54:07 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 12:12:57 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 12:17:39 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 13:30:23 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 14:13:26 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 16:00:38 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 16:00:51 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 17:32:03 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 17:33:17 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 17:43:39 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Falck 1999-05-31 19:55:12 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 22:48:46 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-05-31 22:58:57 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 23:32:27 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-05-31 23:32:29 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-05-31 23:32:50 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-01 00:38:11 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Mauch 1999-06-01 06:32:41 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-01 09:45:52 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-01 12:16:50 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Ian W. Wright 1999-06-01 12:37:43 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-01 17:03:26 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-01 22:05:54 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Mauch 1999-06-02 06:30:25 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Mauch 1999-06-02 06:42:14 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Buchanan, James (Jim) 1999-06-02 13:01:09 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-02 13:33:07 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-02 14:26:20 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-02 14:45:01 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-02 15:01:17 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-02 23:19:44 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-03 00:26:35 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Ian W. Wright 1999-06-04 13:47:19 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-05 16:54:15 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-05 17:34:22 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-05 23:39:08 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-05 23:41:51 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-05 23:42:39 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-06 00:03:27 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-06 00:30:52 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-06 01:00:46 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-06 01:37:57 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Falck 1999-06-06 05:51:38 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-06 17:16:33 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-06 21:05:20 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-06 22:06:24 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-06 22:30:17 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-06 22:57:18 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Matt Shaver 1999-06-06 23:16:03 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-06 23:29:41 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Jon Elson 1999-06-06 23:46:32 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-07 21:59:53 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Tim Goldstein 1999-06-08 22:07:54 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS Dan Mauch 1999-06-09 06:18:23 UTC Re: Linux vs. DOS