Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-11-08 19:17:30 UTC
In a message dated 11/8/2002 6:00:50 PM Central Standard Time,
jj5412@... writes:
supported shafting, as was the case when I built the large X-Y table.
Second, the BALLS get very small, even though the "published ratings" say the
linear-bearing bushings will "handle" the planned load, and the RPM of the
tiny balls will wear them and the shafting very rapidly (or, at least "groove
it").
I support all the shafting I CAN, when I do something, but the "open"
shafting is the least occlusive, when you want to have access (and SEE!) what
you are doing!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
jj5412@... writes:
> What about using supported shafts with open linear bearings? You couldWell, that's true, and it "isn't". Sometimes, the mechanicals preclude
> use a lot smaller shafts.
>
supported shafting, as was the case when I built the large X-Y table.
Second, the BALLS get very small, even though the "published ratings" say the
linear-bearing bushings will "handle" the planned load, and the RPM of the
tiny balls will wear them and the shafting very rapidly (or, at least "groove
it").
I support all the shafting I CAN, when I do something, but the "open"
shafting is the least occlusive, when you want to have access (and SEE!) what
you are doing!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Gene
2002-11-07 23:12:50 UTC
Shafting
echnidna
2002-11-07 23:55:04 UTC
Re: Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 14:43:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 14:46:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JJ
2002-11-08 15:59:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 19:17:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Denis Casserly
2002-11-09 08:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
echnidna
2002-11-09 13:57:20 UTC
Re: Shafting