Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2002-11-08 22:14:51 UTC
Gene wrote:
those 6' spans, even
without the weight of the carriage, router, etc. With the router and
carriage, it will really be
bad. Will this have the 6' axis on the base, and the 4' axis rides on
that? I think you might need
to use supported shafts or an I beam for a 6' span. When it is moving,
I'd expect the 6' axis
to wobble and bounce quite a bit, which will make it even worse.
Jon
>Im thinking of using 1.250 shafts to span 6' and 1.00 to span 48" on aThose are unsupported shafts? I think you'll have a good deal of sag in
>cnc router. I am wondering if that's big enough or if I should go
>bigger? any thoughts would be appreciated. thank you.
>
>
those 6' spans, even
without the weight of the carriage, router, etc. With the router and
carriage, it will really be
bad. Will this have the 6' axis on the base, and the 4' axis rides on
that? I think you might need
to use supported shafts or an I beam for a 6' span. When it is moving,
I'd expect the 6' axis
to wobble and bounce quite a bit, which will make it even worse.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Gene
2002-11-07 23:12:50 UTC
Shafting
echnidna
2002-11-07 23:55:04 UTC
Re: Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 14:43:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 14:46:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JJ
2002-11-08 15:59:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
JanRwl@A...
2002-11-08 19:17:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Jon Elson
2002-11-08 22:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
Denis Casserly
2002-11-09 08:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shafting
echnidna
2002-11-09 13:57:20 UTC
Re: Shafting