Re: Re: Re: emc and following error problems
Posted by
Ray Henry
on 2002-11-29 08:39:41 UTC
> From: Jon Elson <elson@...><s>
> In fact, deadband is a very dangerous thing, as it introduces aYour code writing here sounds like a good thing for your stepper and
> non-linear transfer function
> inside a control loop. I would recommend setting deadband to 0.0 in
> all cases.
>
> I have a separate thing in the code that essentially provides a
> deadband to prevent servo hunting.
> It puts the rate generators in stop if the "voltage" is commanded to be
> less than an absolute
> value of 0.001 The simulated DACs go from 0 .. 10 V, so that is .0001
> of max velocity.
servo setups. I can see how the traditional deadband also fed in to the
position loop would work this way.
Just to be clear, It is still a valuable thing for traditional open loop
stepper setups. I was on a project recently where the stepper driver
would not throttle back when idle because it was hunting between two
steps. Both the motors and amps got quite warm. The hint is a noticable
buzz from the stepper motor.
Ray
Discussion Thread
got_milk_eh
2002-11-27 09:46:08 UTC
emc and following error problems
Askew, Jason
2002-11-27 13:23:38 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc and following error problems
got_milk_eh
2002-11-27 13:53:17 UTC
Re: emc and following error problems
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-27 18:39:53 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc and following error problems
Ray Henry
2002-11-28 06:41:12 UTC
Re: emc and following error problems
alex
2002-11-28 07:28:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc and following error problems
Ray Henry
2002-11-28 18:13:22 UTC
Re: Re: Re: emc and following error problems
Jon Elson
2002-11-28 22:28:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: emc and following error problems
Ray Henry
2002-11-29 08:39:41 UTC
Re: Re: Re: emc and following error problems
alex
2002-11-29 09:28:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: emc and following error problems