RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-12-02 08:06:49 UTC
Hi, Randy:
A couple of questions -
Have you ever tried your system at 'insanely low' speeds to see if it has a
chance at working at all? I'm guessing that you're trying to run too fast.
It's best to start slow and then increase speed on each axis a little at a
time until you start dropping steps. Then back off a little.
In my glossary, jog means that you take a few steps at a time to move the
controlled point a few thousanths of an inch or so. With moves that small,
you'll never get to the 60 ipm you claim.
I've also used DR-DOS, so that isn't a problem. But, what drivers have you
loaded? if you've got EMM386.EXE and maybe HIMEM.SYS running, they may be
causing enough overhead with the 18.2 millisecond clock interrupt that you
can't get a robust pulse stream.
Before I updated to an obsolete old pentium, I was running a Sherline mill
at step rates between 2600 and 4000 steps per second using a Zenith
486DX2-50 notebook, DR-DOS, and TurboCNC as the GCode interpreter. My speed
was limited to the mechanical system, not the computer or the OS or
software.
-- Jerry
|I finally got the thing running this weekend, and it is not running
|reliably. I have the drivers in half-step mode, which with the 4mm-pitch
|leadscrews gives 2540 steps per inch. I can jog the X and Y axes at
|insanely fast speeds (200 ipm,) but I have fast jog set at 60 ipm. I'm
|using CNCPro running under DR-DOS 7.03.
A couple of questions -
Have you ever tried your system at 'insanely low' speeds to see if it has a
chance at working at all? I'm guessing that you're trying to run too fast.
It's best to start slow and then increase speed on each axis a little at a
time until you start dropping steps. Then back off a little.
In my glossary, jog means that you take a few steps at a time to move the
controlled point a few thousanths of an inch or so. With moves that small,
you'll never get to the 60 ipm you claim.
I've also used DR-DOS, so that isn't a problem. But, what drivers have you
loaded? if you've got EMM386.EXE and maybe HIMEM.SYS running, they may be
causing enough overhead with the 18.2 millisecond clock interrupt that you
can't get a robust pulse stream.
Before I updated to an obsolete old pentium, I was running a Sherline mill
at step rates between 2600 and 4000 steps per second using a Zenith
486DX2-50 notebook, DR-DOS, and TurboCNC as the GCode interpreter. My speed
was limited to the mechanical system, not the computer or the OS or
software.
-- Jerry
|I finally got the thing running this weekend, and it is not running
|reliably. I have the drivers in half-step mode, which with the 4mm-pitch
|leadscrews gives 2540 steps per inch. I can jog the X and Y axes at
|insanely fast speeds (200 ipm,) but I have fast jog set at 60 ipm. I'm
|using CNCPro running under DR-DOS 7.03.
Discussion Thread
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-12-01 22:35:26 UTC
Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Tim Goldstein
2002-12-01 23:05:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-12-01 23:53:15 UTC
RE: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
CL
2002-12-02 06:59:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-12-02 08:06:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-12-07 23:34:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-12-07 23:54:02 UTC
Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded
Chris L
2002-12-08 07:52:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded
Peter
2002-12-08 08:43:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Peter
2002-12-08 08:48:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded
Chris L
2002-12-08 09:34:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Peter
2002-12-08 12:00:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
gadget_c <billsand@c...
2002-12-08 12:29:52 UTC
Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
mariss92705 <mariss92705@y...
2002-12-08 12:33:18 UTC
Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Chris L
2002-12-08 16:22:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Chris L
2002-12-08 16:37:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Peter
2002-12-08 18:57:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance
Peter
2002-12-08 19:02:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance