CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance

Posted by Chris L
on 2002-12-08 16:37:20 UTC
Well, as with any new development, It takes time. Two methods are
applied, Create and fix/build on the fly, or Wait, and Release When it
is as ready as it ever could be. If I was a developer, "conservative"
would be my choice. Sometimes people get really upset when it takes so
long, but on the other hand, your not working late nights with bug
patches and e-mail apologies. It also gets old trying to stay ahead of
the "hungry" users, making sure a fix or new release is posted for
download every day.

I've been finding the latest FC betas to be very good. Pretty much I
have abandoned the old version. I have found a big difference in which
version Main Chip I use though, and am still going to talk to Ron to see
if I can figure out why just to settle my own curiousity..

Chris L

Peter wrote:

>Hi Chris,
>
>Thx for your comments - I know the answer is in there somewhere and I,
>too am not pointing fingers... I have purchased the Flashcut V2 upgrade
>and am familiar with the extra direction timing controls that are
>out/imminent to be released. I'm continuing my testing with both
>versions as there are still things that V1.43 is doing better than V2
>and I'm still tuning my motors. The new version looks great and will
>give greater control and many new features but it is not yet as
>bulletproof as 1.43. I understand why it's not yet in wide release.
> Flashcut is very conservative in releasing software. I respect that -
>having worked for a company that treated customers like guinea pigs.
>
>Cheers, Peter
>
>
>

Discussion Thread

Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-12-01 22:35:26 UTC Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Tim Goldstein 2002-12-01 23:05:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-12-01 23:53:15 UTC RE: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance CL 2002-12-02 06:59:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Carol & Jerry Jankura 2002-12-02 08:06:49 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-12-07 23:34:24 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Randy Gordon-Gilmore 2002-12-07 23:54:02 UTC Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded Chris L 2002-12-08 07:52:11 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded Peter 2002-12-08 08:43:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Peter 2002-12-08 08:48:00 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance and the importance of being grounded Chris L 2002-12-08 09:34:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Peter 2002-12-08 12:00:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance gadget_c <billsand@c... 2002-12-08 12:29:52 UTC Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance mariss92705 <mariss92705@y... 2002-12-08 12:33:18 UTC Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Chris L 2002-12-08 16:22:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Chris L 2002-12-08 16:37:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Peter 2002-12-08 18:57:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance Peter 2002-12-08 19:02:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Skipping steps, avoiding resonance