Re: Digest Number 355

Hi Drew,
Actually, I've started to play around with this [actually, I decided to
try also to get the 31-Jan-2000 source found in 2.0.36 to compile.] And,
yeah, I've seen the same thing. I don't by any means have this all
sorted out, but the simple things I've found so far is that some of the
Makefiles have a non-current location for rtl includes (eg for example:
/usr/src/beta11/rtl/include). This needs changed to whatever structure
you are using. I just made soft links /usr/src/rtl and /usr/src/rtlinux
to the rtl dir of my rtlinux build & Makefile changes.
A second thing I found is that MODULES such as rtl_sched.o weren't
found. I'm just starting to look at this, but it seems the relevant
directive only searches /usr/rtl/modules. In V2.0 it seems that only
rtl_fifo.o and rtl_posixio.o are put here. rtl_sched.o, for instance,
goes into ../rtl/schedulers. So this needs corrected. Either I'll update
the directives, or else just soft-link the needed modules to
../rtl/modules. I really want to work with the new source, as it seems
to have alot of advantages. It uses the mbuf module now, so that you
don't have to set aside the top 1M of memory (a lot cleaner), and some
other changes, too.
Anyhow, 'seems like we both have some work ahead. If anyone else has the
31Jan 2000 source running under the 2.2.13 kernel, I'd really like to
have the details!!
Drew Rogge wrote:

>
> From: Drew Rogge <drew@...>
>
> George,
>
> Have you been able to compile the Oct. 22 release of EMC for 2.2.10?
>
> I've been trying off and on for a few days and am having trouble
> compiling emcmot.c. For some reason it either isn't including rtl_sched.h
> or is getting the wrong one from somewhere.
>
> Anyone else trying to move to RH 6.1?
>
> Drew
>
>
> --
> Drew Rogge
> drew@...
>

--

-------------------------------
George Fouse,
President
G F I Consulting
-------------------------------