Re: Digest Number 355
Posted by
Ian Wright
on 2000-02-11 01:46:53 UTC
Hi,
I went there, spent a lot of time trying and then gave up and moved back to
5.2! There are bugs in the 2.2.* version of EMC and it doesn't seem likely
that Fred will put a lot of work into sorting it until he has the version
for 5.2 running properly. Don't forget we aren't the primary focus of his
work and his agenda calls for him to get one version up and running properly
so he probably can't find the time to get sidelined onto working on another
kernel version. By the time EMC for 5.2 is finished linux will probably have
moved on to version 2.3.* (which already exists) or even 2.4.*.
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
I went there, spent a lot of time trying and then gave up and moved back to
5.2! There are bugs in the 2.2.* version of EMC and it doesn't seem likely
that Fred will put a lot of work into sorting it until he has the version
for 5.2 running properly. Don't forget we aren't the primary focus of his
work and his agenda calls for him to get one version up and running properly
so he probably can't find the time to get sidelined onto working on another
kernel version. By the time EMC for 5.2 is finished linux will probably have
moved on to version 2.3.* (which already exists) or even 2.4.*.
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
----- Original Message -----
From: Drew Rogge <drew@...>
>
> George,
>
> Have you been able to compile the Oct. 22 release of EMC for 2.2.10?
>
> I've been trying off and on for a few days and am having trouble
> compiling emcmot.c. For some reason it either isn't including rtl_sched.h
> or is getting the wrong one from somewhere.
>
> Anyone else trying to move to RH 6.1?
Discussion Thread
Adrian Godwin
2000-02-10 13:26:55 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
Adrian Godwin
2000-02-10 13:19:14 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
George Fouse
2000-02-10 13:49:56 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
Drew Rogge
2000-02-10 14:00:13 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
Jon Elson
2000-02-10 14:58:19 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
George Fouse
2000-02-10 14:58:08 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
George Fouse
2000-02-10 15:02:47 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
Ian Wright
2000-02-11 01:46:53 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
paul@A...
2000-02-11 05:53:19 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355
WAnliker@a...
2000-02-11 08:19:21 UTC
Re: Digest Number 355