Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Posted by
alex
on 2003-02-12 07:31:20 UTC
Its fairly easy to write an app for DOS using WATTCP for network.
They have high level calls with sockets.
Very fast.
Alex
They have high level calls with sockets.
Very fast.
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Jeffree <tony@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated
Direction pins
> I'm amazed that there aren't solutions readily available that use Ethernet
> connections rather than the parallel port.
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
> At 14:52 12/02/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >Bernard,
> >
> >Ditto.
> >
> >And even though the p-port is disappearing,(but will not "really" be
> >gone for awhile) the current crop of pc-based cnc controllers is
> >including support for additional i/o with the use of another p-port,
> >or support of generic i/o cards, or usb, game port or otherwise...
> >
> >In other words, it's a solution in search of a problem, IMO.
> >
> >Ballendo
> >
> >P.S. But a neat idea!
> >
> >--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Bernard R
> ><bwjarandall@c...>" <bwjarandall@c...> wrote:
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Doug Fortune <pentam@c...>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Doug,
> > >
> > > While there is no technical difficulty doing time division
> >multiplex
> > > with muliple controllers, I don't really see the need. The current
> > > limitaion is using a single parallel port as the computer
> >interface.
> > > From what little I've seen the G2002 project is well in hand so the
> > > limited output pins should soon be history.
> > >
> > > From the practical side I could see a lot of people having problems
> > > with the concept and trouble shooting such a system would be a
> > > nightmare for the average hobbyist with limited technical knowledge
> > > and virtually no test equipment.
> > >
> > > Bernard
> > >
> > > > re: dedicated Direction & Step pins need 2*N output lines
> > > > vs shared Direction & dedicated Step pins need N+1 output lines
> > > > (N is number of axes), thus saving output pins which are limited
> > > > in number on a parallel port, and hence often a constraint.
> > > >
> > > > Chris L wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > >>It would appear to be for some type of "single axis at a time
> > > positioning"
> > > >
> > > > Doug wrote:
> > > > > >Absolutely not!
> > > > > >This is a general scheme for lathes, mills, routers and
> >hexapods
> > > >
> > > > > Maybe by a "hand cranker".... but, On a CNC mill or Router ??
> > > Now I am
> > > > > lost..... Even on my simple 3 axis router, I assure you I can
> >and
> > > do
> > > > > have more than one motor turning, and in opposite directions at
> > > any
> > > > > given time, even for simple 2d profiles.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Chris:
> > > >
> > > > Yup, lots of motors turning simultaneously at different speeds,
> > > > accelerations and directions, thats how S&D motor drivers work
> > > > (as you well know!).
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think you are missing something obvious.... the Step
> > > > signals to the motor drivers are of the order of 1 uS (1
> >millionth
> > > > of a second). Apparent smooth motor motion results from emitting
> > > > one of these pulses (say 20,000 times/sec or once every 50
> > > millionths).
> > > >
> > > > In other words, you could have many (50 channels in this example)
> > > > sharing a common direction pin, and neither the motors nor the
> > > human
> > > > would be able to detect any measurable difference. However the
> > > Geckos
> > > > (much as I like them) have a hold-time constraint on the
> >Direction
> > > line
> > > > which precludes their use in a "shared-direction" scheme.
> > > >
> > > > <more written offline to Chris>....
> > > >
> > > > Doug Fortune
> > > > http://www.cncKITS.com
> >
> >
> >Addresses:
> >FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> >FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> >timg@...
> >Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> >URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> >OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> >If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects
> >goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> >reach it if you have trouble.
> >http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
> >sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for
> >OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> >NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> >THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> >bill
> >List Mom
> >List Owner
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> Regards,
> Tony
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Discussion Thread
Doug Fortune
2003-02-09 18:45:18 UTC
Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Chris L
2003-02-09 19:45:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Bernard R <bwjarandall@c...
2003-02-09 20:15:30 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-09 20:19:16 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Bernard R <bwjarandall@c...
2003-02-09 20:58:07 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Doug Fortune
2003-02-09 21:34:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 06:52:09 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 06:53:36 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Tony Jeffree
2003-02-12 07:01:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
alex
2003-02-12 07:31:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
Mariss Freimanis <mariss92705@y...
2003-02-12 07:48:51 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 08:22:34 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 08:26:14 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
ccq@x...
2003-02-12 11:07:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated
Andre' Blanchard <andre_54005@y...
2003-02-12 11:11:38 UTC
Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins
alex
2003-02-12 13:50:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Shared Direction pins vs dedicated Direction pins